Today : a historic moment for the Internet, ICANN, IETF, Verisign and the Dept of Commerce. The root zone of Internet is now more secure - signed cryptographically w/ DNSSEC. Special thanks to Rick Lamb, DNSSEC lead in ICANN; Steve Crocker, SSAC; Suzanne Woolf, RSSAC; Congratulations to all that made it possible today! As also a member of SSAC I am proud to pass the information to colleagues and friends among ALAC and at large members. Best to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados & IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8 Tel: + 55 11 3266.6253 Mob: + 55 11 8181 1464 -----Original Message----- From: gtld-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:gtld-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Cheryl Langdon-Orr Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:58 PM To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Cc: gtld-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC Working List Subject: Re: [GTLD-WG] Fwd: DAG v4 Public Comments from GNSO BC constituency for our information and possible action. Still think a call with BC might be worthy for this and many other reasons... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) On 15 July 2010 23:42, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:

Thank you for the document, Cheryl.

I deplore that, after the work the IRT has done, and the compromise which

the STI-WG has painfully but proudly achieved, BC has come back to its

starting point on many of the details of the URS, TM Clearinghouse and

PDDRP.

Whilst some of the points which BC have developed in their comment actually

make sense (and I recall Zahid Jamil + I agreeing on, because they made

sense), I am surprised that the BC is still proceeding forward with "marks

within", and various guises of similarity (and now translation?!?) - which

were strictly rejected (and quite rightly so) by the majority of the STI-WG

because they were unreasonable.

That said - the section about communities is one which looks interesting

and might need further study.

Kind regards,

Olivier

Le 14/07/2010 00:22, Cheryl Langdon-Orr a écrit :

Hello all...

In my emails today I have received these DAG v4 Public Comments from GNSO

BC constituency for our information and possible action, (you will remember

the BC reached out to us previously re DAG 3 and what they felt might be

mutual concerns and interest points) which I am passing on to both the ALAC

for their consideration and to this end will have an Agenda Item set for

say 10-15 mins discussion on DAG4 and new gTLD matters at our July Meeting

and of course for the consideration and possible action by our new gTLD WG

(should this WG have any contributions on this or other DAG4 matters by our

meeting that would be appreciated and we can also set some time aside to

hear from any Members present at the meeting as well.

Evan can you let me know if there is anything we can do to facilitate the

WG's activities on this => perhaps set up a call with some members of the BC

etc., ?

Cheryl Langdon-Orr

(CLO)

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Ron Andruff <ra@dotsportllc.com> <ra@dotsportllc.com>

Date: 14 July 2010 01:01

Subject: DAG v4 Public Comments

To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> <langdonorr@gmail.com>, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "Steven J. Metalitz" <met@msk.com> <met@msk.com>

Dear all,

As you know the BC, in large measure driven by me in this case, took issue

with four aspects of DAGv3, namely:

· ICANN Staff Recommendations for Rights Protection Mechanisms

· Translations of Strings from ASCII to Other Scripts or Languages

· Revised Comparative Evaluation Scoring

· Market Differentiation Between New gTLDs

The entire BC comment is attached for your ease of reference.

While I do not know (and would like to hear from others that are better

informed) what happened with regard to our first issue, RPMs, I do know that

the BC’s other three comments were wholly ignored by staff.

I have spoken with each of you along this path to new gTLDs on various

occasions about these issues, Steve has taken up the mantle with me most

recently in Brussels regarding Comparative Evaluation Scoring, but we need

your so/constituencies to weigh in as well. I know that there was some

timing difficulties in your getting positions out the last comment period,

so I am hopeful that you can pick up on these important issues this time

around.

Please let me know if there is anything further I can do to assist you in

supporting these important issues.

Thanks in advance for your consideration.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff

President & CEO

dotSport LLC

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+1 212 481-2820 ext. 11

Visit us at: www.dotSportLLC.com

*Click **here* <http://www.dotsportllc.com/index.php?pageId=27> <http://www.dotsportllc.com/index.php?pageId=27>* for

dotSportLLC's latest update!*

_______________________________________________

GTLD-WG mailing listGTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttp://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/li stinfo/gtld-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.org

Working Group direct URL: https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?new_gtld_policy

--

Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html

_______________________________________________ GTLD-WG mailing list GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg_atlarge-lists.icann. org Working Group direct URL: https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?new_gtld_policy Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida. Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br Versão: 9.0.829 / Banco de dados de vírus: 271.1.1/3006 - Data de Lançamento: 07/15/10 08:09:00