CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on ICANN Jurisdiction
Dear colleagues, on the ICANN evolution working group's last call ( https://community.icann.org/x/F47RAw ) we had a very healthy discussion on the topic of ICANN Jurisdiction which one of the CCWG Accountability workstream 2 sub-groups is addressing. The sub-group has sent out a short questionnaire to collect input from the community. This is attached. The questions are: 1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way? If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects. 2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in? If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects. 3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above? If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links. 4. a. Are you aware of any material, documented instance(s) where ICANN has been unable to pursue its Mission because of its jurisdiction?* If so, please provide documentation. b. Are you aware of and able to document the existence of an alternative jurisdiction where ICANN would not be so prevented from pursuing its Mission? If so, please provide documentation. Please be so kind to let us know your answers. Kindest regards, Olivier (for the At-Large ICANN evolution working group)
I would hope that Cuban and Iranian internet users reply to this questionnaire. regards Robert -- Robert Guerra Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom Email: rguerra@privaterra.org PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra On 7 Feb 2017, at 6:35, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
Dear colleagues,
on the ICANN evolution working group's last call ( https://community.icann.org/x/F47RAw ) we had a very healthy discussion on the topic of ICANN Jurisdiction which one of the CCWG Accountability workstream 2 sub-groups is addressing. The sub-group has sent out a short questionnaire to collect input from the community. This is attached.
The questions are:
1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way? If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects. 2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in? If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects. 3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above? If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links. 4. a. Are you aware of any material, documented instance(s) where ICANN has been unable to pursue its Mission because of its jurisdiction?* If so, please provide documentation. b. Are you aware of and able to document the existence of an alternative jurisdiction where ICANN would not be so prevented from pursuing its Mission? If so, please provide documentation.
Please be so kind to let us know your answers.
Kindest regards,
Olivier (for the At-Large ICANN evolution working group) _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Actually, I was thinking in terms of similar lines, but also wondering whether under the Trump administration the jurisdiction issue would not become worse. R.
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Robert Guerra Inviato: martedì 7 febbraio 2017 15:02 A: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Cc: ALAC Working List; At-Large Worldwide Oggetto: Re: [At-Large] CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on ICANN Jurisdiction
I would hope that Cuban and Iranian internet users reply to this questionnaire.
regards
Robert
-- Robert Guerra Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom Email: rguerra@privaterra.org PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra
On 7 Feb 2017, at 6:35, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
Dear colleagues,
on the ICANN evolution working group's last call ( https://community.icann.org/x/F47RAw ) we had a very healthy discussion on the topic of ICANN Jurisdiction which one of the CCWG Accountability workstream 2 sub-groups is addressing. The sub-group has sent out a short questionnaire to collect input from the community. This is attached.
The questions are:
1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way? If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects. 2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in? If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects. 3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above? If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links. 4. a. Are you aware of any material, documented instance(s) where ICANN has been unable to pursue its Mission because of its jurisdiction?* If so, please provide documentation. b. Are you aware of and able to document the existence of an alternative jurisdiction where ICANN would not be so prevented from pursuing its Mission? If so, please provide documentation.
Please be so kind to let us know your answers.
Kindest regards,
Olivier (for the At-Large ICANN evolution working group) _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
participants (3)
-
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond -
Robert Guerra -
Roberto Gaetano