FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns
If you take a look at last year's correspondence from WIPO to ICANN, you'll note the same set of unresolved complaints regarding registrars, namely: non-compliant registration provisions, the failure to provide complete or correct registration information, simple uncontactability, 'cyberflight'-related or other modifications to registrant data after a complaint is filed, and failure to properly implement transfer decisions. Francis Gurry also wrote: "WIPO has informed ICANN of many such instances and will shortly provide a fuller overview of these practices, which call for independent and active oversight." See http://www.icann.org/correspondence/gurry-to-twomey-04jul07.pdf What has been ICANN's response to this situation? Have we seen any efforts to clean up the problems? I haven't; and obviously WIPO hasn't seen any progress either. Perhaps we can take up these issues with Stacey Burnette at the upcoming NARALO teleconference... I'm sure there's a legitimate reason why ICANN continues to do little-to-nothing to address valid complaints :( ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
participants (1)
-
Danny Younger