Hello everyone. ICANN has not yet started accepting applications for new gTLDs. To its credit, at its meeting in Cartagena the ICANN Board has been convinced of the seriousness of certain remaining issues enough to delay the launch of the new round despite severe pressure from potential applicants and ICANN's own contracted parties. However, the onus is now back upon us and others who took issue with the proposed creation procedures. We have made it clear what we did not like, in issues such as the Independent Objector (IO), the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP), and the regressive changes to in trademark-related takedown notices. Now we need to propose what we *do* want, simply and directly. This means, specifically, that we need to create specific wording changes to the new TLD Applicant Guidebook. The goal is to offer to the Board a ready-made set of changes that have: - Community approval as broad as possible - Wording that modifies the existing DAG as little as possible while still accomplishing our goals - Full consistency with existing GNSO policy and existing CWG consensus (on both Rec6 and applicant support) If we are able to do this, we will have presented both a vision for our approach to new gTLDs and a fully-charted method of execution. Doing so will enable us to take initiative, providing a constructive way forward for the Board to speed TLD introduction. This is a significant task. Without enough people to share the load this can't happen ... and if it doesn't, we will have nobody to blame but ourselves for missing this opportunity to get our policy goals across. If you are interested in helping with the background research or the 'wordsmithing' of changes to the Applicant Guidebook, please let me know as soon as possible. -- Evan Leibovitch Chair, At-Large gTLD Working Group
I'm onboard! ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Hello everyone.
ICANN has not yet started accepting applications for new gTLDs. To its credit, at its meeting in Cartagena the ICANN Board has been convinced of the seriousness of certain remaining issues enough to delay the launch of the new round despite severe pressure from potential applicants and ICANN's own contracted parties.
However, the onus is now back upon us and others who took issue with the proposed creation procedures. We have made it clear what we did not like, in issues such as the Independent Objector (IO), the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP), and the regressive changes to in trademark-related takedown notices. Now we need to propose what we *do* want, simply and directly.
This means, specifically, that we need to create specific wording changes to the new TLD Applicant Guidebook. The goal is to offer to the Board a ready-made set of changes that have:
- Community approval as broad as possible - Wording that modifies the existing DAG as little as possible while still accomplishing our goals - Full consistency with existing GNSO policy and existing CWG consensus (on both Rec6 and applicant support)
If we are able to do this, we will have presented both a vision for our approach to new gTLDs and a fully-charted method of execution. Doing so will enable us to take initiative, providing a constructive way forward for the Board to speed TLD introduction.
This is a significant task. Without enough people to share the load this can't happen ... and if it doesn't, we will have nobody to blame but ourselves for missing this opportunity to get our policy goals across.
If you are interested in helping with the background research or the 'wordsmithing' of changes to the Applicant Guidebook, please let me know as soon as possible.
-- Evan Leibovitch Chair, At-Large gTLD Working Group _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Count me in - Dev Anand Teelucksingh On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Hello everyone.
ICANN has not yet started accepting applications for new gTLDs. To its credit, at its meeting in Cartagena the ICANN Board has been convinced of the seriousness of certain remaining issues enough to delay the launch of the new round despite severe pressure from potential applicants and ICANN's own contracted parties.
However, the onus is now back upon us and others who took issue with the proposed creation procedures. We have made it clear what we did not like, in issues such as the Independent Objector (IO), the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP), and the regressive changes to in trademark-related takedown notices. Now we need to propose what we *do* want, simply and directly.
This means, specifically, that we need to create specific wording changes to the new TLD Applicant Guidebook. The goal is to offer to the Board a ready-made set of changes that have:
- Community approval as broad as possible - Wording that modifies the existing DAG as little as possible while still accomplishing our goals - Full consistency with existing GNSO policy and existing CWG consensus (on both Rec6 and applicant support)
If we are able to do this, we will have presented both a vision for our approach to new gTLDs and a fully-charted method of execution. Doing so will enable us to take initiative, providing a constructive way forward for the Board to speed TLD introduction.
This is a significant task. Without enough people to share the load this can't happen ... and if it doesn't, we will have nobody to blame but ourselves for missing this opportunity to get our policy goals across.
If you are interested in helping with the background research or the 'wordsmithing' of changes to the Applicant Guidebook, please let me know as soon as possible.
-- Evan Leibovitch Chair, At-Large gTLD Working Group _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Hi, I'm in, though still jetlagged. Hong On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com>wrote:
Count me in -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Hello everyone.
ICANN has not yet started accepting applications for new gTLDs. To its credit, at its meeting in Cartagena the ICANN Board has been convinced of the seriousness of certain remaining issues enough to delay the launch of the new round despite severe pressure from potential applicants and ICANN's own contracted parties.
However, the onus is now back upon us and others who took issue with the proposed creation procedures. We have made it clear what we did not like, in issues such as the Independent Objector (IO), the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP), and the regressive changes to in trademark-related takedown notices. Now we need to propose what we *do* want, simply and directly.
This means, specifically, that we need to create specific wording changes to the new TLD Applicant Guidebook. The goal is to offer to the Board a ready-made set of changes that have:
- Community approval as broad as possible - Wording that modifies the existing DAG as little as possible while still accomplishing our goals - Full consistency with existing GNSO policy and existing CWG consensus (on both Rec6 and applicant support)
If we are able to do this, we will have presented both a vision for our approach to new gTLDs and a fully-charted method of execution. Doing so will enable us to take initiative, providing a constructive way forward for the Board to speed TLD introduction.
This is a significant task. Without enough people to share the load this can't happen ... and if it doesn't, we will have nobody to blame but ourselves for missing this opportunity to get our policy goals across.
If you are interested in helping with the background research or the 'wordsmithing' of changes to the Applicant Guidebook, please let me know as soon as possible.
-- Evan Leibovitch Chair, At-Large gTLD Working Group _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Dr. Hong Xue Professor of Law Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ <http://iipl.org.cn/> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
I don't know that I can add much at policy rewrite level but I am happy to proofread. j On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I'm in, though still jetlagged.
Hong
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com
wrote:
Count me in -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Hello everyone.
ICANN has not yet started accepting applications for new gTLDs. To its credit, at its meeting in Cartagena the ICANN Board has been convinced of the seriousness of certain remaining issues enough to delay the launch of the new round despite severe pressure from potential applicants and ICANN's own contracted parties.
However, the onus is now back upon us and others who took issue with the proposed creation procedures. We have made it clear what we did not like, in issues such as the Independent Objector (IO), the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP), and the regressive changes to in trademark-related takedown notices. Now we need to propose what we *do* want, simply and directly.
This means, specifically, that we need to create specific wording changes to the new TLD Applicant Guidebook. The goal is to offer to the Board a ready-made set of changes that have:
- Community approval as broad as possible - Wording that modifies the existing DAG as little as possible while still accomplishing our goals - Full consistency with existing GNSO policy and existing CWG consensus (on both Rec6 and applicant support)
If we are able to do this, we will have presented both a vision for our approach to new gTLDs and a fully-charted method of execution. Doing so will enable us to take initiative, providing a constructive way forward for the Board to speed TLD introduction.
This is a significant task. Without enough people to share the load this can't happen ... and if it doesn't, we will have nobody to blame but ourselves for missing this opportunity to get our policy goals across.
If you are interested in helping with the background research or the 'wordsmithing' of changes to the Applicant Guidebook, please let me know as soon as possible.
-- Evan Leibovitch Chair, At-Large gTLD Working Group _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Dr. Hong Xue Professor of Law Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ <http://iipl.org.cn/> 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org ---------------------------------------------------------------
participants (5)
-
Carlton Samuels -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Evan Leibovitch -
Hong Xue -
Joly MacFie