Hi All WIPO has described Belize Domain WHOIS Service as follows: "Furthermore, the pattern of the Respondent's conduct as a serial cybersquatter in many similar recent cases also leads the Panel to the conclusion that the disputed domain name was registered and is used in bad faith." http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2007/d2007-1515.html Indeed searching for "Belize Domain WHOIS service" and "wipo.int" shows a disproportionate number of WIPO UDRP's. Surely the alarm bells should have gone off somewhere already. Why should people continuously have to pay to defend something that should be monitored at a different level. This is just another example of accountability issues. Derek
Derek and all my friends, We have been here before. This decision was and remains in error. It is in error as FREDERICIA FURNITURE is not registered as a IC type 32 Trade mark and therefore is only a valid trademark in Denmark, no where else. See USPTO.GOV TESS Trademark search database facility for confirmation. The US amongst many countries does not recognize jurisdictional specific Trade Marks, nor for that matter does Denmark, BTW unless by international trade agreements and ratified treaties that indicate or specifically state such. In Denmark's case, WIPO is of very little legal or factual consequence, and cannot force, but can influence the use of FREDERICIA FURNITURE in any Domain Name string... My suggestion is that FREDERICIA FURNITURE hire itself an Trade Marke legal specilist and register it's mark(s) in accordance with applicable and jurisdictional Trademark law. Derek Smythe wrote:
Hi All
WIPO has described Belize Domain WHOIS Service as follows: "Furthermore, the pattern of the Respondent's conduct as a serial cybersquatter in many similar recent cases also leads the Panel to the conclusion that the disputed domain name was registered and is used in bad faith." http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2007/d2007-1515.html
Indeed searching for "Belize Domain WHOIS service" and "wipo.int" shows a disproportionate number of WIPO UDRP's.
Surely the alarm bells should have gone off somewhere already. Why should people continuously have to pay to defend something that should be monitored at a different level.
This is just another example of accountability issues.
Derek
Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
participants (2)
-
Derek Smythe -
Jeffrey A. Williams