Thanks Avri. Best, Brian On 12/29/13 2:12 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

I don't think any of these are contentful, except maybe the last one, but probably not even that one.

Am now going to try and read through the rest of it for one last time.

avri

page 2

only an assessment of ICANN¹s implementation of those Recommendations only

(double 'only')

in 9.5 page 8

don't need both the parenthetical with url and the footnote with the url.

page 10

it believes that it may establish gTLD policy7 in the event that the

(in line footnote number in wrong font.)

page 11

12.4. In order to improve accountability and transparency ICANN¹s Board should base the yearly budgets on a multi-annual strategic plan and corresponding financial framework [covering e.g. a three-year period]. This rolling plan and framework should reflect the planned activities and the corresponding expenses in that multi-annual period. This should include specified budgets for the ACs and SOs. ICANN¹s [yearly] financial reporting shall ensure that it is possible to track ICANN¹s activities and the related expenses with particular focus on the implementation of the [yearly] budget. The financial report shall be subject to public consultation.

(what does it mean that some text is in square brackets. Is it using diplomatic convention of listing controversial text that way. It is the only instance in the recommendations of [] so I don't understand their usage. Should they be parenthesis? ) _______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2