ATRT2 and Public comment - remarks to the meeting today
Dear all, I am sorry I can't attend the meeting today, but I have some comments about the public comments. We have asked for public comments about issues that the ATRT2 should look into in this review. In order to respect the comments and the time used creating them, I think it is very important to ensure that all the issues mentioned in the comments are either reflected and specifically taken care of in each work-stream. If not included, we need to specify why the issue isn't reflected and/or taken care of. This need to be a very explicit explanation. This means that we have to make a reply document to the comments (and of course more work), but it will be a way to ensure transparency of our choices to the public. Best, Lise
Hi, I very much agree with this. avri On 20 Jun 2013, at 06:51, Lise Fuhr wrote:
Dear all,
I am sorry I can’t attend the meeting today, but I have some comments about the public comments.
We have asked for public comments about issues that the ATRT2 should look into in this review.
In order to respect the comments and the time used creating them, I think it is very important to ensure that all the issues mentioned in the comments are either reflected and specifically taken care of in each work-stream. If not included, we need to specify why the issue isn’t reflected and/or taken care of. This need to be a very explicit explanation.
This means that we have to make a reply document to the comments (and of course more work), but it will be a way to ensure transparency of our choices to the public.
Best, Lise
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
As Avri and Carlos I fully agree with Lise. Best regards Jørgen Sendt fra min iPad Den 20/06/2013 kl. 12.57 skrev "Avri Doria" <avri@ella.com>:
Hi,
I very much agree with this.
avri
On 20 Jun 2013, at 06:51, Lise Fuhr wrote:
Dear all,
I am sorry I can’t attend the meeting today, but I have some comments about the public comments.
We have asked for public comments about issues that the ATRT2 should look into in this review.
In order to respect the comments and the time used creating them, I think it is very important to ensure that all the issues mentioned in the comments are either reflected and specifically taken care of in each work-stream. If not included, we need to specify why the issue isn’t reflected and/or taken care of. This need to be a very explicit explanation.
This means that we have to make a reply document to the comments (and of course more work), but it will be a way to ensure transparency of our choices to the public.
Best, Lise
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
_______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
Makes sense Carlos Raul Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +(506) 8837 7176 -----Original Message----- From: "Lise Fuhr" <lise.fuhr@difo.dk> Sender: atrt2-bounces@icann.org Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:51:26 To: <atrt2@icann.org> Subject: [atrt2] ATRT2 and Public comment - remarks to the meeting today _______________________________________________ atrt2 mailing list atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
participants (4)
-
Avri Doria -
carlosraulg＠gmail.com -
Jørgen C Abild Andersen -
Lise Fuhr