Fiona, the Rec that I worded as suggested in Washington was:

The Board must address all AoC RT recommendations in a clear and unambiguous manner, indicating to what extent they are accepting each recommendation.

During our conference call on Tuesday, I suggested and Steve said that he could support a recommendation on having the Board apply a time line to all accepted recommendations. Here is a wording that I hope is acceptable.

In responding to Review Team recommendations, the Board must provide an expected time frame for implementation, and if that time frame is different from one given by the RT, the rationale should address the difference.

If you would like me to add them to the document on the Wiki myself, please let me know. Alan