- ATRT3-implementation-shepherds

Planning Prioritization Framework Project Consultation
by Becky Nash 12 Dec '21

12 Dec '21

Dear ATRT3 Implementation Shepherds: The org’s Planning team is working on developing a prioritization framework for ICANN’s work, including the implementation of policies and review recommendations and we are reaching out to request an informal consultation. As part of this project, a pilot is to be conducted on a limited scope of work: the reviews implementation work. We are aware that several of you attended the consultations and webinars held on this project. However, we believe that a consultation with this group on this project would be very useful given that there are clearly similarities between this project and recommendations made by ATRT3. For clarity, this would not be a formal consultation of the shepherds about ATRT3 recommendations and the corresponding implementation work. We will send out a doodle pool shortly to obtain a convenient date and time for this meeting. Please let us know if you have any questions about this request. Thank you in advance and we look forward to holding a meeting with this group. Sincerely, Becky Nash, VP Planning Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Los Angeles, California, USA Mobile: (310) 745-2413 www.icann.org

3 2

Update - Board Action on ATRT3 Report
by Theresa Swinehart 06 Dec '20

06 Dec '20

Dear ATRT3 Implementation Shepherds, On Monday, 30 November, the ICANN Board voted to approve all of the recommendations outlined in Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf>, and directed the ICANN President and CEO, Göran Marby, to take all actions directed to the ICANN organization. The resolutions will be available shortly on ICANN.org<http://icann.org/>. On behalf of the ICANN org, I extend sincere appreciation to everyone who contributed or participated in this review. I especially want to thank the volunteers who comprised the Review Team. Over the past 14 months, you have dedicated a tremendous amount of time, energy, and effort all in support of ICANN’s Mission. I also want to thank each of you for agreeing to serve in the important role of providing clarification related to the intentions of the ATRT3 as ICANN org moves into the implementation planning phase. Best, Theresa Swinehart SVP, Global Domains & Strategy

3 2

Clarification request: ATRT3 Org Reviews recommendation
by Jennifer Bryce 17 Nov '20

17 Nov '20

Dear ATRT3 implementation shepherds, I hope this email finds you well. I am seeking a clarification, please, regarding the Reviews recommendation in Section 8.4 of the ATRT3 Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf>. The recommendation text on p72 related to Organizational Reviews states, “ATRT3 shall evolve the content of Organizational Reviews into continuous improvement programs in each SO/AC/NC.” The executive summary of this recommendation on p11 reads “ATRT3 recommends that the Board and ICANN org…Evolve the content of the Organizational Reviews into continuous improvement programs in each SO/AC and Nominating Committee (NC).” Can you please confirm if the ATRT3 intended to direct this recommendation to Board and ICANN org, as opposed to ATRT3? Thank you, Jennifer -- Jennifer Bryce Project Manager, Review Support and Accountability Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann Email: jennifer.bryce(a)icann.org

2 2

(no subject)
by Touseef Khan Khan 07 Oct '20

07 Oct '20

Sent from my Huawei Mobile

1 0

(no subject)
by Touseef Khan Khan 07 Oct '20

07 Oct '20

Sent from my Huawei Mobile

1 0

FW: Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus
by Larisa B. Gurnick 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hello all, I hope that this note finds you all doing well. Just following up on the note below. In regards to the first item noted below, “Draft documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns”, have you had a chance to confirm what our team has assembled on your behalf, and would you like us to submit it to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group on your behalf? The document is attached here for your convenience. I know that you are still in the process of discussing the second item noted below – your input on the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework. We appreciate your thoughtful consideration of this item and look forward to your input, when you are able to provide it. Thank you, Larisa From: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 6:04 AM To: "atrt3-implementation-shepherds(a)icann.org" <atrt3-implementation-shepherds(a)icann.org> Cc: Leon Sanchez <leon.sanchez(a)board.icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart(a)icann.org> Subject: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda, Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion. DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns In response to several questions from the Board<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-Septembe…>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work. Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed. · Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draf…>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework? Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views. The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here [drive.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZ…>. As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process. Best wishes, Larisa

2 1

Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] ATRT3 implementation shepherds doc
by Brenda Brewer 28 Sep '20

28 Sep '20

Good day all, Please see wiki here<https://community.icann.org/x/BYM4C> for the Zoom replay of the ATRT3 Implementation Shepherds discussion call held 23 September 2020. Transcript will be posted upon receipt, approximately 3-5 business days. Many thanks! Brenda From: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 5:03 PM To: "atrt3-implementation-shepherds(a)icann.org" <atrt3-implementation-shepherds(a)icann.org> Subject: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] ATRT3 implementation shepherds doc Hi everyone, Here is the link to the Google doc I just created for your use – let me know if you have any problems with access: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UEZPGec9tD84eWuHhFGZ2y_YH6NkOCFRvG1kV9K… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1UEZPGec9tD84…> Brenda will send a quick note around once the recording is posted to the wiki. We’ll look forward to hearing from you wrt setting up a follow-up meeting next week. Best, Jennifer -- Jennifer Bryce Associate Project Manager, Review Support and Accountability Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann Email: jennifer.bryce(a)icann.org

2 1

ATRT3 implementation shepherds doc
by Jennifer Bryce 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

Hi everyone, Here is the link to the Google doc I just created for your use – let me know if you have any problems with access: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UEZPGec9tD84eWuHhFGZ2y_YH6NkOCFRvG1kV9K… Brenda will send a quick note around once the recording is posted to the wiki. We’ll look forward to hearing from you wrt setting up a follow-up meeting next week. Best, Jennifer -- Jennifer Bryce Associate Project Manager, Review Support and Accountability Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann Email: jennifer.bryce(a)icann.org

3 2

Our call tomorrow and request to review preparatory material,
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

In advance of our meetup tomorrow I thought it may be of use if we looked to the Question 10 issue first as that requires perhaps more discussion time... obviously we will assume we have all refamiliarised ourselves with the Boards draft proposal in preparation... So after basic admin to start off the call lets start with *firstly a discourse regarding what adjustments (if any) to the principles outlined in the proposal or the effectiveness framework... With the aim of starting to create a response to the specific questions posed by the Board Caucus:* - To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? - What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? - How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework? For your ease of reference, the full text of Question 10 reads:-: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-commu…>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework? The *secondary Agenda item is of course our opinion and comments on the list of ATRT3 discussions of Public Comments that has been generated.* I have copied this document into a google doc and your invitation to comment etc., should be accessed from the following link, please use suggestion mode to make comments etc., let me know if you can;t get access... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y-bloEdb7sBuVQCAxRdhgpSLkyBm6VrqhafBYVY… OK that will do for now I think, catch up soon on Zoom, at 2100 UTC ... <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_m…> Cheryl Langdon-Orr about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_m…>

3 2

Doodle Update may need to add a couple more time slot options.
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Quick update we have all polled now BUT.... Pat can only make 1 time slot, and that is the only time slot SeB is unavailable for, so I have asked Pat if there are additional times we might add to see if we can all gather before I close the poll...I will keep you posted and ask you to edit options if Pat has any time bands that work for him this week or even early next... Be great to sort this out by no later end of today... if no additional options from Pat, then Seb is there any chance you can change anything to be available at the Wed 23rd 2100 time slot? All feedback is appreciated <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_m…> Cheryl Langdon-Orr about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_m…>

2 3