Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus
Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda, Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion. DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns In response to several questions from the Board<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work. Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed. · Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf> , in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework? Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views. The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing>. As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process. Best wishes, Larisa
Thank you for your email and as Vanda said the "feedback" Larisa, We shall have a little caucus of our own in coming days and get back to you as soon as practicable. Team expect a doodle soon to see when we can get together... On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 23:04 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda,
Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion.
*DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns *
In response to several questions from the Board <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work.
Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group.
*Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration*
During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed.
· Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework?
Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views.
The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page <https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing>.
As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process.
Best wishes,
Larisa
_______________________________________________ ATRT3-implementation-shepherds mailing list ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt3-implementation-shepherds
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hello Cheryl, Vanda and all, Please let us know if you need any assistance and support. Best wishes, Larisa From: "langdonorr@gmail.com" <langdonorr@gmail.com> Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 6:55 PM To: "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> Cc: "atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org" <atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>, Leon Sanchez <leon.sanchez@board.icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Thank you for your email and as Vanda said the "feedback" Larisa, We shall have a little caucus of our own in coming days and get back to you as soon as practicable. Team expect a doodle soon to see when we can get together... On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 23:04 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda, Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion. DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns In response to several questions from the Board<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work. Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed. • Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVsz93gXFA$>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework? Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views. The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here [drive.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVveULtg0A$>. As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process. Best wishes, Larisa _______________________________________________ ATRT3-implementation-shepherds mailing list ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org<mailto:ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt3-implementation-shepherds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVuybdy6jQ$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVte_bBA-g$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Will do. But our doodle is still being filled out by some... We will keep you updated. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 05:00 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Cheryl, Vanda and all,
Please let us know if you need any assistance and support.
Best wishes,
Larisa
*From: *"langdonorr@gmail.com" <langdonorr@gmail.com> *Date: *Friday, September 18, 2020 at 6:55 PM *To: *"Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> *Cc: *"atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org" < atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>, Leon Sanchez < leon.sanchez@board.icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart < theresa.swinehart@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus
Thank you for your email and as Vanda said the "feedback" Larisa,
We shall have a little caucus of our own in coming days and get back to you as soon as practicable.
Team expect a doodle soon to see when we can get together...
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 23:04 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda,
Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion.
*DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns *
In response to several questions from the Board <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work.
Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group.
*Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration*
During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed.
· Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVsz93gXFA$>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework?
Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views.
The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page <https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here [drive.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVveULtg0A$>.
As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process.
Best wishes,
Larisa
_______________________________________________ ATRT3-implementation-shepherds mailing list ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt3-implementation-shepherds
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVuybdy6jQ$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVte_bBA-g$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Cheryl, friends, What is your thoughts for next steps? I am not sure have responded to a doodle for next call. Kisses, Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> Date: Monday, September 21, 2020 at 16:02 To: "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> Cc: ATRT3-implementation-shepherds <atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>, Leon Sanchez <leon.sanchez@board.icann.org>, Theresa SWINEHART <theresa.swinehart@icann.org> Subject: Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] [Ext] Re: Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Will do. But our doodle is still being filled out by some... We will keep you updated. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 05:00 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Cheryl, Vanda and all, Please let us know if you need any assistance and support. Best wishes, Larisa From: "langdonorr@gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>" <langdonorr@gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 6:55 PM To: "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org>> Cc: "atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org<mailto:atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>" <atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org<mailto:atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>>, Leon Sanchez <leon.sanchez@board.icann.org<mailto:leon.sanchez@board.icann.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Thank you for your email and as Vanda said the "feedback" Larisa, We shall have a little caucus of our own in coming days and get back to you as soon as practicable. Team expect a doodle soon to see when we can get together... On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 23:04 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda, Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion. DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns In response to several questions from the Board<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work. Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed. • Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVsz93gXFA$>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework? Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views. The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here [drive.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVveULtg0A$>. As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process. Best wishes, Larisa _______________________________________________ ATRT3-implementation-shepherds mailing list ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org<mailto:ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt3-implementation-shepherds _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVuybdy6jQ$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVte_bBA-g$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Venda the link only went out yesterday to the Skype chat ... But here it is as well to this list that has us and I assume staff etc., as well... https://doodle.com/poll/nwb6ven8yervgd42 On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 08:11 Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
Hi Cheryl, friends,
What is your thoughts for next steps? I am not sure have responded to a doodle for next call.
Kisses,
*Vanda Scartezini*
*Polo Consultores Associados*
*Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
*01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
*Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253*
*Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 *
*Sorry for any typos. *
*From: *ATRT3-implementation-shepherds < atrt3-implementation-shepherds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> *Date: *Monday, September 21, 2020 at 16:02 *To: *"Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> *Cc: *ATRT3-implementation-shepherds < atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>, Leon Sanchez < leon.sanchez@board.icann.org>, Theresa SWINEHART < theresa.swinehart@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] [Ext] Re: Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus
Will do. But our doodle is still being filled out by some... We will keep you updated.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 05:00 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Cheryl, Vanda and all,
Please let us know if you need any assistance and support.
Best wishes,
Larisa
*From: *"langdonorr@gmail.com" <langdonorr@gmail.com> *Date: *Friday, September 18, 2020 at 6:55 PM *To: *"Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> *Cc: *"atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org" < atrt3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org>, Leon Sanchez < leon.sanchez@board.icann.org>, Theresa Swinehart < theresa.swinehart@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [ATRT3-implementation-shepherds] Follow up from ATRT3 implementation shepherd call with the ATRT3 Board Caucus
Thank you for your email and as Vanda said the "feedback" Larisa,
We shall have a little caucus of our own in coming days and get back to you as soon as practicable.
Team expect a doodle soon to see when we can get together...
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 23:04 Larisa B. Gurnick <larisa.gurnick@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Adetola, Cheryl, Daniel, Pat, Sébastien and Vanda,
Thank you for your active and engaged participation and productive contributions toward the discussion on 8 September with the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group. We would like to follow up on two items from this discussion.
*DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns *
In response to several questions from the Board <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt3-implementation-shepherds/2020-September/000003.html>, at your suggestion, the ATRT3 support staff assembled the attached documentation “DRAFT Documentation of ATRT3 Handling of Public Comments & ATRT3 Member Concerns.” This report provides a summary of points throughout ATRT3 face-to-face and virtual plenary meetings where public comments on the Draft ATRT3 report were referenced or discussed. ICANN org assembled this information based upon the public record which can be found on the ATRT3 wiki <https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3>. This information is not intended to be an analysis of ATRT3’s assessment of public comments or work.
Please review the attached documentation and confirm that it is what you had in mind to address some of the Board’s questions. Please let us know if there are additional documents that you would like to share with the Board. After your confirmation and approval, we will forward the documentation to the ATRT3 Board Caucus Group.
*Question for ATRT3 implementation shepherds’ consideration*
During the 8 September call, we noted one question where you indicated that additional thought and consideration on your part would be needed.
· Question 10: The Board developed a draft proposal, “Resourcing and Prioritization of Community Recommendations: Draft Proposal for Community Discussion” [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-proposal-resourcing-community-recommendations-29oct19-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVsz93gXFA$>, in consultation with the ATRT3 leadership as well as the leadership of all other community-led reviews. It was published in October 2019. The draft proposal suggests principles for effective recommendations, along with a table that offers a proposed effectiveness framework for assessing the effectiveness of a given recommendation. To what extent was the ATRT3 able to use this framework as guidance for developing recommendations? What aspects were useful and what aspects posed difficulties? How would the ATRT3 implementation shepherds suggest adjusting the principles and the proposed effectiveness framework?
Once you have had a chance to think about the last portion of the above question, the Board Caucus would appreciate your input and views.
The recording from the 8 September call will soon be available on the Implementation shepherd wiki page <https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/ATRT3+Implementation+Shepherds>; in the meantime, you can listen to it here [drive.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/file/d/1S3y7lC2zYg5kLKZgnLdSOnOXLMPFxZvB/view?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVveULtg0A$>.
As the Board continues its consideration of the ATRT3 recommendations, there may be additional follow up questions or clarifications; we will continue to keep you informed of such developments. Thank you again for your diligent work and help with this part of the ATRT3 review process.
Best wishes,
Larisa
_______________________________________________ ATRT3-implementation-shepherds mailing list ATRT3-implementation-shepherds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt3-implementation-shepherds
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVuybdy6jQ$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!o_Ker0kANSKGQNb_NQ7QS-Hq1Ah_-PVfkRMJi_JZ6tY5TUJhbCSZJOCes0XoxQ4FcVte_bBA-g$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (3)
-
Cheryl Langdon-Orr -
Larisa B. Gurnick -
Vanda Scartezini