Sorry to belabor this, team, but I wonder if something like this would be more constructive while still signaling the fact that abuse has not significantly been reduced:
DNS Abuse is a high interest topic in the larger ICANN community with several stakeholders working on developing policy to mitigate and reduce abuse in the #DNS. The BC looks forward to constructively contributing to long-term solutions, as evidence for businesses is that abuse has not significantly abated.
#ICANN #ICANNBC #DNS #Domains #DNSAbuse #Internet
…I’m falling into Marie’s camp that if we just point out the ICANN report and that we think it’s misguided, it’s more sniping than anything else.
Thoughts?
Mason Cole | Perkins Coie LLP
INTERNET GOVERNANCE ADVISOR
1120 N.W. Couch Street Tenth Floor
D. +1.503.727.2074
From: Lawrence O. Olawale-Roberts <lawrence@microboss.org>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 3:45 AM
To: Marie Pattullo - AIM <marie.pattullo@aim.be>
Cc: Timothy Smith <tim.smith@cipa.com>; Cole, Mason (POR) <MCole@perkinscoie.com>; Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>; Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>; BC Executive Committee <bc-excomm@icann.org>; Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>;
Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
Thanks all for your comments and views on our proposed tweet on DNS Abuse. I have taken the liberty of infusing Tim's initial edit and Marie's thus:
DNS Abuse is a high interest topic in the larger ICANN community with several stakeholders working on developing policy to mitigate and reduce abuse in the #DNS. ICANN has recently published a report using the data from the DAAR project that takes into consideration 4 years of data derived from multiple RBL (Reputation Block Lists), yet contrary to this report there is no practical evidence for business that abuse has gone down.
Link to the full ICANN report we disagree with - https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/last-four-years-retrospect-brief-review-dns-abuse-trends-22mar22-en.pdf
#ICANN #ICANNBC #DNS #Domains #DNSAbuse #Internet
Where we cannot adopt "1" as framed, I also support that we drop it from the list of materials to be posted.
Lawrence.
On 29/04/2022 10:21 am, Marie Pattullo - AIM via Bc-excomm wrote:
Either don't post 1 at all, or use Tim's first edit with one addition:
"...ICANN has recently published a report using the data from the DAAR project that takes into consideration 4 years of data derived from multiple RBL (Reputation Block Lists), yet there is no practical evidence from business that abuse has gone down. "
It depends what you want to achieve. Here is a report, or here is a report we disagree with. What does it add?
From: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Timothy Smith via Bc-excomm
Sent: Friday, 29 April 2022 02:07
To: Cole, Mason (POR) <MCole@perkinscoie.com>; Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>; Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>; Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>; Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
Either way, I will agree with the will of the ExComm. If not commenting on #1, that's OK.
Tim Smith
General Manager
Canadian International Pharmacy Association
From: "Cole, Mason (POR)" <MCole@perkinscoie.com>
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 6:04 PM
To: Tim Smith <tim.smith@cipa.com>, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>, Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: RE: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
I think I like your first edit better, Tim.
Mason Cole | Perkins Coie LLP
INTERNET GOVERNANCE ADVISOR
1120 N.W. Couch Street Tenth Floor
D. +1.503.727.2074
From: Timothy Smith <tim.smith@cipa.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 3:53 PM
To: Cole, Mason (POR) <MCole@perkinscoie.com>; Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>; Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>; Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>; Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
Maybe change it to
"...ICANN has recently published report using the data from the DAAR project that takes into consideration 4 years of data derived from multiple RBL (Reputation Block Lists), yet business efforts to address abuse have not diminished and we continue to be impacted." Or something like that.
Tim Smith
General Manager
Canadian International Pharmacy Association
From: "Cole, Mason (POR)" <MCole@perkinscoie.com>
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 5:45 PM
To: Tim Smith <tim.smith@cipa.com>, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>, Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: RE: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
I'm good with #2 as is and I can be persuaded to sign off on #1 with Tim's edit.
Mason Cole | Perkins Coie LLP
INTERNET GOVERNANCE ADVISOR
1120 N.W. Couch Street Tenth Floor
D. +1.503.727.2074
From: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Timothy Smith via Bc-excomm
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 7:27 AM
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>; Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>; Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>; Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
All:
I agree with Steve unless we consider revising #1 to remove word 'showcase' and perhaps modify with more of a BC slant and insert some language such as
"...ICANN has recently published report using the data from the DAAR project that takes into consideration 4 years of data derived from multiple RBL (Reputation Block Lists), yet there is no practical evidence from business that abuse has gone down."
From: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve DelBianco via Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Reply-To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 8:31 AM
To: Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>, Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
I support #2 but do not support issuing #1 under the BC name. The BC does not want to imply that we believe DNS abuse has declined.
From: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Brenda Brewer via Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:19 AM
To: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media PostsDear BC ExComm,
A kind follow-up to the inquiry below. BC Communications Committee is seeking ExComm approval of the social media draft posts noted below.
Kind regards,
Brenda
From: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Reply-To: Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org>
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 at 12:12 PM
To: Bc-excomm <bc-excomm@icann.org>
Cc: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes@icann.org>
Subject: [Bc-excomm] FW: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
Dear BC ExComm,
Kindly review the draft posts below from the BC Communications Committee. They are seeking BC ExComm approval to post on BC's social media on behalf of the BC.
To further explain, the decision was made during the BC Communication call on 1 April 2022 to have ICANN Secretariat, Brenda, forward email from BC Communications Committee with suggested posts for BC's social media platforms, ie: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. Upon BC Excomm receipt, review and approve or make suggested changes and return to me with BC Comms Committee copied. These emails will be limited to one per week.
Kindly add this topic to the BC Excomm agenda for Thursday, 7 April at 14 UTC. In the meantime, feel free to review the posts below and offer feedback to BC Communications Committee. Thank you!
Kind regards,
Brenda
From: bc-communications <bc-communications-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Vivek Goyal <vivekg@LdotR.Red>
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 9:38 AM
To: Bc Communications <bc-communications@icann.org>
Subject: [bc-communications] Social Media Posts
Hello All,
Please find below two posts that we can possibly share on BC's SM channels
1.
DNS Abuse is a high interest topic in the larger ICANN community with several stakeholders working on developing policy to mitigate and reduce abuse in the DNS system. ICANN has recently published report using the data from the DAAR project that showcases that the measured abuse has gone down over the years.
The report takes into consideration 4 years of data derived from multiple RBL (Reputation Block Lists).
Link to the full report - https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/last-four-years-retrospect-brief-review-dns-abuse-trends-22mar22-en.pdf
#ICANN #ICANNBC #DNS #Domains #DNSAbuse #Internet
Image for this post is attached bleak
2.
The ICANN team has published the stats from the recently concluded meeting ICANN 73 which was a virtual session. One of the most striking number of all the stats that we noticed was the session with the maximum attendance and unsurprisingly it was "Evolving the DNS Abuse Conversation" with 576 unique members attending.
For the full set of stats please refer to this link - file:///Users/vivekgoyal/Downloads/icann73-technical-report-17mar22-en.pdf
#ICANN73 #ICANN #Domains #DNS #ICANNBC
Please share your thoughts and your social media posts for the BC channels.
Thank you
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Bc-excomm mailing list
Bc-excomm@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bc-excomm
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
--
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal, professional or other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you should not store it, copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. The views expressed are those of the sender and his company MicroBoss. Please note that whilst we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any e-mail is virus-free. |
|||||||||||||||
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.