Channel 1. BC participation in ICANN Public Comment process:
Channel 2. Support for discussion and votes of our representatives on GNSO Council
GNSO Project Status available at https://www.icann.org/en/processes/gnso/current-issues.html
Channel 3. Supporting discussion and voting on policy matters before the Commercial Stakeholders Group (CSG)
Channel 4. BC statements and responses during public meetings (outreach events, public forum, etc.)
Affirmation review team for Whois (Susan Kawaguchi, Lynn Goodendorf, Bill Smith)
ICANN's board demonstrated last week that it will continue to direct changes in implementation details for new gTLDs. (summary and briefing documents of the 5-Jan Informational Board meeting here ). The board made it clear that it expects "remaining implementation work":
The Board held an informational call with staff regarding the planning for the opening of the New gTLD Program application window on 12 January 2012. … The Staff and the Board discussed (1) operational readiness for the New gTLD Program, including the posting of a new version of the Applicant Guidebook reflecting the interim amendments approved by the Board; (2) the status of plans for timely execution of the GAC requests regarding the Early Warning, application batching process, trademark clearinghouse procedures, planning for a second round, and applicant support; (3) providing responses to recent correspondence regarding the New gTLD Program; and (4) next steps in providing the Board further information on remaining implementation work.
In particular, briefing document 4 (here) describes ongoing work on implementing RPMs:
TM Clearinghouse Process Development: This work focuses on implementing the new rights protection mechanisms that were agreed on during the new gTLD discussions. An invitation for volunteers from the community to engage with ICANN in building out the clearinghouse processes resulted in a group of over 50 volunteers. This group (Implementation Assistance Group, IAG) began meetings in November and is working through a number of issues from both process and technical standpoints.
Seems to me there are opportunities to press for improvements that advance established BC positions — without delaying the gTLD application process.