Members,

 

Thanks Aparna for making updates to the document.

 

I am fine to accept the changes and in particular for the sections that I authored. I would ask that Tim Cheng,  Andrew Mack and Martin Sutton also advise of their respective sections.  

 

David,  I am not aware of any existing BC position on the issue or scope of Public interest.    Your suggestion  that we recognize that public interest issues within the context of ICANN’s mandate are within its purview, seems a reasonable approach.    

 

If Aparna can restore the public interest points within this, and post back to the list, it would be a step forward.

 

We need to submit the final version on the 31^st January.

 

Many thanks for contributing.

   

 best

 

Chris Chaplow
Managing Director
Andalucia.com S.L.
Avenida del Carmen 9
Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
1ª Planta, Oficina 30
Estepona, 29680
Malaga, Spain
Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
E-mail: chris@andalucia.com
Web: www.andalucia.com
Information about Andalucia, Spain.

 

De: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] En nombre de Aparna Sridhar

Enviado el: lunes, 27 de enero de 2014 19:13
Para: Marilyn Cade

CC: Steve Delbianco; bc - GNSO list; Chen, Tim; Chris at Andalucia
Asunto: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year strategic plan

 

All--

 

Please see some suggested edits from Google on the attached document.  While there is some amount of reorganizing, I believe our suggested edits preserve the points made in the original document while making some improvements for flow and clarity.  I have also suggested deviation from ICANN's proposed submission form where adhering to it obscured the content of our comments. 

 

Cheers, 

Aparna

Aparna Sridhar

Counsel

Google Inc.

1101 New York Avenue N.W.

Second Floor

Washington, DC 20005

tel:  202.346.1261

e-mail: aparnasridhar@google.com

 

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote:

I will draft something for ICANN mission/lingage to I-GOV. I wanted to hear from CCWG and 1NET first, and that happened this week.

 

I also moved this to bc-private just temporarily.  

 

David, Aparna, Philip, and I were on CCWG and David, Aparna, and others from business COMMUNITY, were on relevant calls last week. I will send a short assessment over week end. 

 

If members want public access to our discussions, we can move back to public list, but I didn't want to do that, without full consideration from BC members.

 

M

---

From: sdelbianco@netchoice.org
To: bc-gnso@icann.org
CC: tim@domaintools.com; chris@andalucia.com
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year strategic plan
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:27:45 +0000

 

Attached is the current draft BC comment on ICANN’s Vision, Mission & Focus for 5-year Strategic Plan, which came out of last summer’s "brainstorming" by board, community and staff. (link)

 

Tim Chen and Chris Chaplow led drafting of the BC comment, with help from Martin Sutton, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.

 

Comments close 31-Jan, so today begins our 14-day review period.

 

We need draft comments for Focus Area V: Defining role clarity for ICANN in the Internet governance ecosystem. 

Yesterday I shared my views about ICANN limiting its mission and avoiding entanglements in the broader I-Gov debate.       If no BC members contribute text for Area V, then I can draft something next week.

 

Please REPLY ALL with edits (TRACK CHANGES)as soon as possible, since the comment deadline is 31-Jan-2014.

 

Thanks again to Tim and Chris for taking the lead on this.

 

—

Steve DelBianco

Vice chair for policy coordination