Dear Marilyn and colleagues,
I wanted to flag that the US moves its
clocks forward on 14 March and Europe only ‘springs forward’ on 28
March, so we need to bear this in mind for the teleconference next week as the
time difference between the US and some other countries will be reduced by 1
hour.
I cannot make a call on Thursday 18 March at
10am EST with the new time difference, but can do 9am EST or 11am EST for 1
hour; I can do 9am or 10am EST on Friday for 1 hour.
Best,
Ayesha
From:
owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: vendredi 12 mars 2010 09:24
To: Steve Delbianco; bc - GNSO
list; jon Nevett
Subject: [bc-gnso] BC
debrief/encourage members to post regarding their views on the list
We are of course using our public list for our exchanges so that all members
and the interested public of business users can read our updates. Thanks to
Steve for his posts. For other members, please do also share your perspectives
on this list. You are welcome to share your views about any of the
resolutions, not just those related to gTLD policy.
BC DEBRIEF:
I will note that I've had a conversation regarding when to
hold the update, and I'm targeting next Thursday or Friday, so mark your
calendars, and stay tuned for a bridge .
For the ExComm, please confirm your availability for both
dates, keeping a focus on 10 a.m. EST which is bearable for Zahid in
The call will last an hour for members and all who were in
Finally, we will have a 5 minute update on planning for
business outreach and activites in
We have two pending recruits, who tell me they are
submitting applications Monday. If that is underway, I will invite them as
observers to the call. Try to remember to add Jon Nevett in, and we will have
him added shortly.
Marilyn Cade
BC Chair
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:08:17
-0500
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN Board votes to shut-down the EOI program
From: sdelbianco@netchoice.org
To: bc-gnso@icann.org
Resolution cited
uncertainty about date for resolution of Overarching Issues to satisfaction of
the board; difficulty in synchronizing applications program with EOI;
preferring to focus staff on remaining issues;
Resolve to withdraw EOI; and direct CEO to press on with new gTLD program
Discussion:
Harald Alstrand: still concerned about risks of many new gTLDs and wants CEO to
be attentive to those risks.
Bruce Tonkin: confusion about purpose(s) of EOI. Would have given data on
# and nature of strings. Would have informed applicants to improve their
applications. Staff and community resources are being taken away from
underlying problems; so up-or-down vote is the best way to proceed.
Crocker: primary purpose of EOI was to give magnitude of demand;
Raimundo changed his mind on EOI because there was lack of consensus for it.
Resolution Passed: overwhelmingly. Just one No vote from
Michael Silber (I think)
Michael Silber: EOI had potential benefits and it's a pity its being thrown
out.
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482