Hi Berry,
Thanks for all your efforts. I support the paper as drafted.
No, we are not working under any new rules, the policy position
process is set out in the Charter, linked from bizconst.org. We do not
typically need to vote on position statements, as they are adopted by
acclamation if no negative comments are offered. If you have none by
11/6, then it shall be adopted.
Thanks!
Mike
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
From:
owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Berry
Cobb
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:21 PM
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working
Group
CBUC,
I was not able to remotely attend the CBUC session yesterday due
to conference line issues. However, I will be sure to catch the recorded
session.
It was my intent to quickly ask for clarification around the BC
Position Statement for PEDNR. I understood from our last BC conference
call that a vote was NOT required on this, regardless of my misstatement
below. Either way, I submitted a draft of the statement to the BC List on
10/20 for comments and edits, and to date, Marilyn’s comments below are all
that has been received.
May I ask for assistance with a few questions below, please?
1.
Are we, in fact, dealing with “new rules” as stated
below? Either way, can I get a pointer to where the Constituency Position
Statement process is located? I’m sure it probably exists on the ICANN
site somewhere, but I cannot seem to find it.
2.
Do we need a VOTE on initial position statements like this
(Pre-PDP or PDP)? And if so, when and by what platform is that
accomplished? Is this process initiated by request to the BC Secretariat?
3.
The 11/6 deadline date…..what happens if I receive zero
feedback? I do understand we are in the middle of Seoul, but I would like
to remind everyone that this position statement is beyond the PEDNR working
group’s deadline.
Thank you for the assistance and my apologies for not being in
Seoul. Enjoy the remainder of the sessions.
Berry A. Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891
From: Marilyn Cade
[mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 16:38
To: berrycobb@infinityportals.com; bc - GNSO list
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working
Group
I
need a bit more clarification. Since this requires a vote of the BC [CBUC] are
we first asked for edits and comments, and then a vote, or are we actually
voting on this version?
I
know we are trying to learn new rules, but it would be helpful to get that
clarification.
I
really appreciate that you are doing this work, Berry.
Will
you be joining us in Seoul? It would be good to get acquainted!
Marilyn
From: berrycobb@infinityportals.com
To: bc-gnso@icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:44:42 -0700
CBUC,
My mistake, PEDNR is a formal PDP, and not a Pre-PDP as I
indicated below. My apologies for any confusion.
Berry A. Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891
From: Berry Cobb
[mailto:berrycobb@infinityportals.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 10:16
To: 'bc-gnso@icann.org'
Subject: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
CBUC,
Attached
is the DRAFT Position Statement for CBUC relative to the Post Expiration
Domain Name Recovery Working Group. (PEDNR-WG). All comments and
suggestions are welcome. With the PEDNR being a Pre-PDP, it is my
understanding a formal vote by the CBUC will not occur on this position
statement. Rather, it will be reserved for a final CBUC Position statement
based on PEDNR outcomes and recommendations.
Please
advise if you have questions or comments. I will be sure to
incorporate all comments and changes to this statement.
It
is my desire to have this statement returned to the PEDNR – WG by COB 11/6/2009.
Thank
you.
Berry
A. Cobb
Infinity
Portals LLC
866.921.8891