I agree. It's a disservice to the general public to stick to what is effectively a 21-day comment periods if the GNSO and other Chartering Organizations are unlikely to take final positions until sometime in January at the earliest.
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: Denise Michel <denisemichel@fb.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM
To: Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com>, "bc-private icann.org (bc-private@icann.org)" <bc-private@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Bc-private] FW: [CCWG-ACCT] Public Comment Timeline Concerns -- RE: CCWG - Executive Summary
Thank you for sharing this, Phil. Susan and I agree with your position. The schedule does not leave enough time for BC>CSG/NCPH>Council analysis, public comment consideration, discussion and consensus building on the details of this critical proposal. In addition to unduly rushing substantive community review, I'm concerned that the schedule also leaves ICANN vulnerable to charges of skirting the bottom-up process and accountability commitments.
I think it would be ideal if the GNSO Council communicated the need for an extension to the CCWG-Accountability co-Chairs (and cc'd the Board and other SOs & ACs). Absent that, perhaps a NCPH or CSG request could be issued?
Steve:
I have expressed my concerns on the CCWG and Council lists, as have others, that starting the public comment period from the issuance of this Update (downgraded from the previously promised Executive Summary) is unwise, and that it should start running from November 30 assuming that the 3rd draft Proposal is issued then. Therefore, the comment period ending on December 21 is insufficient at only 21 days -- I have expressed my view that it should run until at least December 30, and others want it to go until Friday. January 8th.
We are not talking about a big delay here but from 9 to 18 additional days to review and comment upon the details of a major revision in approach toward accountability.
I'd welcome your thoughts and those of other BC members, as Council may be weighing in on this as well.
best, Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
This 36-page document is designed to update the community on recent progress in and after ICANN54 in Dublin and raise awareness of the proposed enhancements to ICANN's accountability as a more detailed proposal is finalized. While this formal update reflects the current consensus positions of the group, there are outstanding elements that remain to be finalized. These finishing details are highlighted in the document, and will be confirmed and detailed in the Third Draft Proposal.
The full Third Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations will be shared with the public on 30 November 2015, which will include further explanation and detail about the accountability improvements outlined in this document. It will also explain why the changes have been suggested, how the community arrived at these recommendations and the options considered and ultimately rejected in development of the proposal.
We welcome feedback on this document, and encourage all interested stakeholders to view the full proposal for any outstanding questions or concerns.
Over the last year, a working group of ICANN community members has been developing a set of proposed enhancements to ICANN's accountability to the global Internet community.
This effort is integral to the transition of the United States' stewardship of the IANA functions to the global Internet community, reflecting the ICANN community's conclusion that improvements to ICANN's accountability were necessary in the absence of the accountability backstop that the historical contractual relationship with the United States government provided. The accountability improvements set out in this document are not designed to change ICANN's multistakeholder model, the bottom-up nature of policy development nor significantly alter ICANN's day-to-day operations.
The main elements of the proposal are outlined below. Together with ICANN's existing structures and groups, these accountability enhancements will ensure ICANN remains accountable to the global Internet community.
The accountability elements outlined above will be supported through:
In addition, further proposed changes include:
To develop these recommendations to improve ICANN's accountability, the Working Group:
We look forward to your thoughts and feedback on our Third Draft Proposal on Enhancing ICANN Accountability.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4450/10889 - Release Date: 10/25/15
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4450/10889 - Release Date: 10/25/15
Internal Virus Database is out of date.