That's why we directed this request to Mikey and Chris instead of Phil.

No worries — I will amend our August comment and submit.
--Steve

From: Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:47:27 +0000
To: Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com>, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>
Cc: Chris Chaplow <chris@andalucia.com>, bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@icann.org>
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations

That’s for the current, ongoing IRTP-C WG, where they are still in the planning rather than very much substantive stages.

 

The comment period is for one recommendation from  last year’s IRTP-B.

 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/cell

 

Twitter: @VlawDC

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:20 PM
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: Chris Chaplow; bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations

 

i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one.

 

i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level.

 

sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't.

 

sorry,

 

mikey

 

 

On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote:



Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.  

 

As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link)?

 

This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.

 

Thanks,

Steve

 

From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>

Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400
To: <
irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org>
Cc: "
'bc-GNSO@icann.org GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@icann.org>
Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations

 

The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.

 

If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate.

 

This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter.

--

Steve DelBianco

Vice chair for policy coordination

ICANN Business Constituency

 

 

 

 

- - - - - - - - -

phone    651-647-6109  

fax                          866-280-2356  

web        http://www.haven2.com

handle   OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

 


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2112/4796 - Release Date: 02/08/12