Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
From: mike@haven2.com
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:20:10 -0600
CC: chris@andalucia.com; bc-gnso@icann.org
To: sdelbianco@netchoice.org
i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one.
i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level.
sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't.
sorry,
mikey
On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.
As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (
Link)?
This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.
The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.
If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the
Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate.
This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter.
--
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)