Steve, Anjali, Gabi and colleagues,

 

The draft BC comment is quite good in recommending a number of means by which PICS enforcement can be strengthened.  Considering that the March PICDRP was edited down from 8 pages to 4 in this October version, it is going in the right direction in my view.

 

I support this good work.

 

Thanks and kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ron Andruff

RNA Partners

www.rnapartners.com

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 21:29
To: bc-gnso@icann.org
Cc: Hansen, Anjali; Gabriela Szlak
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution

 

During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this public comment:

 

Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution procedure (PICDRP).      The BC advocated for public interest commitments (beyond what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the DRP.  Need a volunteer…

 

We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the challenge.   

 

Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review and comment.   Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions.    We will finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline of 23-Oct.

 

Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead.

 

--Steve