Resolution cited uncertainty about date for resolution of Overarching Issues to satisfaction of the board;  difficulty in synchronizing applications program with EOI; preferring to focus staff on remaining issues;

Resolve to withdraw EOI; and direct CEO to press on with new gTLD program
 
Discussion:
Harald Alstrand: still concerned about risks of many new gTLDs and wants CEO to be attentive to those risks.
 
Bruce Tonkin: confusion about purpose(s) of EOI.  Would have given data on # and nature of strings.  Would have informed applicants to improve their applications. Staff and community resources are being taken away from underlying problems; so up-or-down vote is the best way to proceed.
 
Crocker: primary purpose of EOI was to give magnitude of demand;
 
Raimundo changed his mind on EOI because there was lack of consensus for it.
 
Resolution Passed: overwhelmingly.    Just one No vote from Michael Silber (I think)
 
Michael Silber: EOI had potential benefits and it's a pity its being thrown out.
 

--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482