Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Review Working Party teleconference held on Thursday 07 August 2014 at 1400 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-20140807-en.mp3
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#julty
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees:
Klaus Stoll
Jennifer Wolfe
Philip Sheppard
Ron Andruff
Chuck Gomes
Stephane Van Gelder
Avri Doria
Rafik Dammak
Guest speaker: Colin Jackson, Richard Westlake
Apologies: none
ICANN Staff:
Larisa Gurnick
Mary Wong
Lars Hoffman
Matt Ashtiani
Glen de St Gery
Nathalie Peregrine
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Nathalie
Adobe Chat transcript:
Matt Ashtiani:Welcome all to the GNSO Review Working Party Meeting on 7 August 2014!
Philip:waiting on phone
Ron A:Greetings all!
Jennifer Wolfe:Hello to everyone!
Philip:on phone line now hello everyone
Chuck Gomes (RySG):Hi
Nathalie Peregrine:Avri Doria has joined the AC room
Matt Ashtiani:survey monkey link - https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSOREVIEW360SURVEY
Matt Ashtiani:Date: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 Time: 19:00-19:30 UTC (time converter: http://goo.gl/kJvuIm)
Matt Ashtiani:Date: Wednesday, 13 August 2014 Time: 14:00-14:30 UTC (time converter: http://goo.gl/UNDIsl)
Matt Ashtiani:Additionaly webinar information - https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-05-en
Nathalie Peregrine:David Maher has joined the AC room
Chuck Gomes (RySG):I assumed the 50 to 100 number was per major category not for total responses.
Chuck Gomes (RySG):I am okay with waiting until after the webinars but I wouldn't wait much longer.
Chuck Gomes (RySG):Poor participation in the webinars would provide a good indicator of the problem of August.
Chuck Gomes (RySG):I think it would be good to do the webinars again in early September.
rafik:@chuck I didnt see announcement circulated yet about the survey
Jennifer Wolfe:Sorry - my phone line dropped - calling back in.
Chuck Gomes (RySG):What about changing the deadline to September 23. Then we could add a week if needed and still end by September 30.
Ron A:@Chuck: support Sept 23
Jennifer Wolfe:Back on line.
Larisa Gurnick:@rafik - staff circulated the announcement to this group yesterday via email and you can see the posted announcement here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-08-05-en
Chuck Gomes (RySG):Please read the WG question that was included.
Ron A:@ Jen: two in the queue since you dropped
Ron A:As Chuck has requested: What is the Working Group question that has been included?
Larisa Gurnick:@Avri - who would be the ideal audience for WG survey?
Colin Jackson:Perhaps any WG survery could be targetted at WG members
Ron A:All members of the GNSO are potential WG members.
Avri Doria:Larisa, all who have been in a WG, and that is aa broad audience that goes beyond gnso
Avri Doria:Colin, exactly, past and present. it is a big filed that goes beyond those who are SG/C members.
Larisa Gurnick:Thank you, Avri
Ron A:Thank you for that. checking back on their affiliation is excellent.
Avri Doria:What about people who are members of one group and observers of another.
Larisa Gurnick:There is a text box in the actual survey - this is a pdf version
Philip:Ignorance has never been a barrier to opinion within ICANN
Philip:; )
Ron A:My concern is that bad actors might see this as an opportunity to cast dispersions on another group. May be wrong, but have been a long time in ICANN...
Ron A:@ Philip: Well said! ;o)
stephane van gelder:understood Richard, thx.
stephane van gelder:that clarification helps a lot
Ron A:What does question #4 mean?
Philip:@ron Q4 may help the BRG respond, and another time a BRG member
Chuck Gomes (RySG):@ Ron: If you were authorized to respond for the BC, you would list the BC.
Ron A:Thanks Larisa. That helps me, but I hope respondents will get it.
Ron A:It appears that Chuck and Philip did, so I'll step back on this.
Ron A:One take away from thsi meeting for me is that we need to get a couple of WG questions into the survey...
Philip:A helpful call - many thanks everyone
Mary Wong:Not sure if this helps, as it doesn't reach the full pool you're hoping for, but existing WG Guidelines do require a WG Self Assessement survey after a WG competes its work.