I agree with Philip. We are a policy development organization,
and should be spending as little time as possible on administrative items like
Charter review. We already spent a lot of precious time on that upon the GNSO
Restructure over the last couple years. Is more really necessary now?
Does this really call for a face-to-face meeting of Members,
when we know only a few members outside of Washington DC can realistically
attend?
From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 1:08 AM
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: [bc-gnso] CSG charter and knock-on effects to BC charter
Sarah,
thanks
for your efforts on leading this.
In
advance of the October 12 meeting would you explain now the proposed CSG
charter changes please?
And
also explain what it is in the BC charter that must change in light of these
CSG updates.
In
the previous BC charter debate we had tried to build in wording explicitly to
AVOID the need to revisit the BC charter.
Given
the months of debate we had on the current BC charter we should be certain that
additional changes really are needed.
Many
thanks
Philip