Channel 1. BC participation in ICANN Public Comment process:
BC response at http://forum.icann.org/lists/ssr-rt-issues/pdfugpgelab81.pdf
BC response at http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-rt/pdfmFVFD8vt7v.pdf
Berry Cobb's discussion draft at http://forum.icann.org/lists/bc-gnso/msg01953.html
Will be submitted 22-Apr.
Channel 2. Support for discussion and votes of our representatives on GNSO Council
Upcoming discussions & votes at 28-Apr GNSO Council teleconference.
Staff posted an analysis of "Privacy & Proxy Relay & Reveal". Council must decide which of remaining 3 studies (Registrant Identification, Proxy and Privacy "abuse" and this Relay and Reveal study) staff should initiate. (see https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+28+April+2011 )
John and Zahid worked with staff on a resolution to commit funding for 3 WHOIS studies. After the SFO Council meeting, a small volunteer group met 6 times to discuss WHOIS studies resolution. Last week, the group hosted Steve Metalitz to address any questions from IPC Councilors, who asked for a deferral on 7-Apr.
Chuck Gomes led the group with Kathy Kleiman (PIR), Don Blumenthal (PIR), Liz Gasster (ICANN), Lisa Phifer (ICANN), and Steve DelBianco. This group believes that the RFP for the Registrant Identification Study (Study 2) needs more definition on how registrants are classified as having 'commercial purpose'. I support another deferral of this work, and can explain if needed.The registries have said they will support our 2 most important studies, with minor adjustments to the studies' scope. I'm talking about the Privacy/Proxy Abuse study (Study 3) and the Relay/Reveal study (Study 4). I support these adjustments. See https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+7+April+2011
Philip Sheppard has drafted BC comments for this topic (attached)
Channel 3. Supporting discussion and voting on policy matters before the Commercial Stakeholders Group (CSG)
Update on voting procedure and candidates for ICANN Board Seat 14. (Sarah Deutsch and Marilyn Cade)
Channel 4. BC statements and responses during public meetings (outreach events, public forum, etc.)
Affirmation review team for Whois (Susan Kawaguchi, Bill Smith)
includes "Review of Vertical Integration for Existing gTLD Registry Operators"
Summary of BC comments in SFO on GAC Scorecard http://forum.icann.org/lists/bc-gnso/msg01890.html
ICANN published new Guidebook on 15-Apr. http://icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-6-en.htmICANN revised response to the GAC Scorecard http://icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/board-notes-gac-scorecard-clean-15apr11-en.pdfGAC on RPMs http://gac.icann.org/press-release/further-gac-advice-new-gtld-rights-protection-mechanisms
BC Comments on prior Guidebook (Dec-2010). http://forum.icann.org/lists/5gtld-guide/pdfpWA9bxOgob.pdf
Module 1: Introduction to New gTLD Application Process and Fees. Berry Cobb, Ron AndruffModule 2: Evaluation Procedures. Philip Sheppard, Jon Nevett, Adam Palmer, Zahid Jamil, Sarah DeutschModule 3: Dispute Resolution. John Berard, Ron AndruffModule 4: String Contention. Ron AndruffModule 5: Transition to Delegation. Philip Sheppard, Fred Fellman, Berry Cobb, Jon Nevett