Dear
all,
I
wanted to bring to the attention of the BC members that the DAGv4 Public Comment
period is coming to a close Wednesday, in one week (July
21st).
We
commented on four aspects in our post regarding DAGv3 (found here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/3gtld-guide/msg00147.html
), to whit:
·
ICANN Staff Recommendations for
Rights Protection Mechanisms
·
Translations of Strings from ASCII
to Other Scripts or Languages
·
Revised Comparative Evaluation
Scoring
·
Market Differentiation Between New
gTLDs
While I do not know (and would like to hear from others
that are better informed) what happened with regard to our first issue, RPMs, I
do know that our other three comments were wholly ignored by
staff.
I
would submit to the members that we need to repost our comments with some
stronger language to ensure that staff hear and react to the BC’s
concerns. Whatever happens, we have one week to submit our
comments.
Comments/thoughts?
Kind
regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
President
RNA
Partners, Inc.
220
+ 1
212 481 2820 ext. 11
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike
O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:09 AM
To: bc - GNSO
list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Policy question -- does the BC want to develop a
position on the current IRTP draft?
subject says it all. IRTP-B is in
public-comments. does the BC have a view?
mikey
- -
- - - - - - -
phone
651-647-6109
fax
866-280-2356
web
http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter,
Facebook, Google, etc.)