Hey Berry, Only the GAC and the GNSO are relevant SOs on this topic. The GAC may be relevant on any topic they choose, regardless of which SO is the main driver. The GAC can also proactively recommend policy if it wants to, but I believe it has always been more reactive than proactive to date. The GAC has certain powers under the Bylaws to recommend policy directly to the Board, and under the AOC which gives GAC heightened review powers and requires GAC consultation on major policy initiatives. Hope this helps. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of berrycobb@infinityportals.com Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 5:41 PM To: bc-GNSO@icann.org Subject: [bc-gnso] .XXX CBUC, I am reviewing the documents and decision tree for the .XXX public comment period. Forgive my inexperience and lack of history regarding this TLD, but can someone explain to me why the GAC Comments (either past or possible new) are a consideration in the decision tree? Why wouldn't any of the SO get equal opportunity to influence or weigh in on the decision outside of public comment? Thank you for enlightening me. Berry Berry Cobb Infinity Portals LLC 866.921.8891