BC members, Attached (and here<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/registration-data-consensus-policy-for-gtlds-24-08-2022/submissions/icann-business-constituency-bc-04-12-2022>) is the BC response to ICANN’s new Draft policy for gTLD Registration data. This is a major piece of work, and we owe a big thanks to drafters Margie Milam, David Snead, and Alex Deacon. This policy is to implement recommendations from EPDP Phase 1 recommendations<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-gtld-registration-data-specs-final-20feb19-en.pdf>, Phase 2 Priority 2 recommendations<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-phase-2-temp-spec-gtld-registration-data-2-31jul20-en.pdf>, and Phase 1 GNSO Council Supplemental Rec 12 adopted<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2022-02-24-en#2.b> by ICANN Board. The BC previously commented on these recommendations here<https://cbu.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/positions-statements/2022/2022_01January_13%20BC-IPC%20Comment%20on%20EPDP%20Phase%202A%20Final%20Report%20for%20Board%20Consideration.pdf>, here<https://cbu.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/positions-statements/2021/2021_09September_10%20BC%20Minority%20Statement%20on%20EPDP%20Phase%202A%20Final%20Report.pdf>, and here<https://www.icannbc.org/assets/docs/positions-statements/2019/2019_04April_17_BC%20Comment%20on%20EPDP%20Phase%201%20Report.pdf>. Thanks again to Margie, David, and Alex.