This is an impressive edit you added as direct participants of the Fellowship Program.

I just want to have some clarification as a quality control before we push this document out.

1. I have been selected once as a Fellow and Twice as a Coach, so I wasn’t wondering if the assertion of not being selected twice once you join the BC would be taken as a Standard.

2. To buttress your point, I equally received a request that my help is needed  by joining the Coaching team for ICANN 61 BUT only if the BC can support my travels. Does this give weight to the fact that the BC is expected to take up the responsibility of supports such new recruits through the Fellowship Program?

3. In my short time of studying the Fellowship issues, I reckon, the bickering seems to always be that the BC is CAPITALISM, whereas others like NCUC, ALAC, GAC, etc are supposedly Anti-CAPITALISM. To that extent, there would hardly be resolve, because of the opposing guiding principles.

Since I am new in the Outreach team, there isn’t much yet for me to say on that front but I align with the fact that Outreach guiding documents could adopt an internal on-boariding system IN ADDITION To that of ICANN MENTOR-MENTEE for new SME members particularly from less served regions either through the Fellowship or directly, 

Many thanks to Marilyn for setting the tone.

Cheers,

TS