Thank you very much
Maureen.
My comments:
·
It’s perhaps better to avoid saying that the
evaluation sheet will record “your attendance” since people will
see it as a watch dog to track them and generally, they react negatively to
such things.
·
The evaluation sheet you are proposing is specific to
each topic. I was thinking of a generic one.
All the other things
are ok with me.
All members of the
WG: please give your opinion before we finalize the sheet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean
Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: + 216 41 649 605
Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
Fax: + 216 70 853 376
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De : capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de
Maureen Hilyard
Envoyé : mercredi 16 avril 2014 22:13
À : Tijani BEN JEMAA
Cc : capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Objet : [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building
Programme
Hi Tijani,
If we want people to come to these sessions
regularly, they must first learn something from them and there should not be
any onerous evaluation after them.
Based on the information that Dev has sent
to us about the COMMUNICATION session, the evaluation draft I have prepared
should firstly just tell us if we achieved OUR objectives or not, and how else
we might be able to assist ALSes to better understand the topic that has been
introduced for later sessions. As the initial evaluation, we also need to know
that the technology is working for them too, otherwise they won’t be able
to attend anyway. My recommendation is to send a brief link to a monkey survey
with the invitation, that participants can return after the session, consisting
of the following.
(To be included into the invitation?)
ALSes are an important part of the At Large
consultation process. Your participation in policy development sessions
contributes to decision-making within At Large and ICANN overall. This session
is part of a programme of topics which aims to provide some background before
the ATLAS II meeting in London. You are expected to attend these sessions and
the evaluation form will record your attendance as well as provide us with
valuable feedback.
(Evaluation form)
To: (Name)
Regional Group (RALO):
Email address:
Thank you for participating in our Pre-ATLAS
II Capacity Building session on COMMUNICATION
Please indicate your responses to the
following questions. (provide buttons to
click)
I was able to hear and understand the
speakers during the session
Yes No
I had no difficulty with the technology
(Adobe Connect or phone
connectivity)
Yes No
I now understand:
1.
The
communication network within At Large (ALSes, RALOs, At Large Staff, the
ALAC)
Yes No
2.
How to
communicate with the At Large community (mailing list, Skype, wiki,
others?)
Yes No
3.
Where to
find information about At Large meetings (emails, At Large
calendar)
Yes No
4.
How to
connect to and participate in an At Large meeting (Adobe, phone bridge,
Skype)
Yes No
Any comments to help us with further capacity
building training in this area?
(provide a comments box– limit 50
words)
SUBMIT (to
At Large staff)
|
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active. |