Survey 1. ALS details 1.1. Date of registration. 1.2. Date of joining At-Large. 1.3. Number of members: - individual members; - organizational members. 1.4. Level of representation of ALS: - international; - national; - regional; - state (?); - local. (table) 1.4. Web-site. 1.5. Contact details (?). 2. Level of expertize 2.1. Core mission (we can segregate it into different strings – technical, judicial and so on and put it into the table) 2.2. In what sphere you can provide your expertise? 2.3. Where you need the help? 2.4. Your ALS members participation in Working Groups, regional or thematic events (IGF, TechDays and so on) – could you please provide us with details? (table) 3. Level of cooperation 3.1. Did you have experience of cooperation with other ALSes, with other ICANN constituencies from your country (ccNSO, GAC and so on), ISOC chapters? (table) 3.2. Did you have experience of cooperation with parallel structures from other countries? 3.3. Did you have experience of influence on governmental decisions within your country? 3.4. Did you participate in working-out the decisions of regional structures regarding Internet Governance? 3.5. Did you participate in WCIT process? 4. Linguistic level 4.1. Native/official/working language(s) 4.2. Other languages – where you can help with translation and understanding, where you need help 4.3. Usability of any on-line tools – could you please share your positive experience regarding using of different languages? 4.4. Wiki-glossary in different languages 5. Communication tools 5.1. Does your ALS have own web-site? (table) - if yes, does it have interactive functions (forums, chat so on)? - if yes, does it have any information, that your ALS is the member of At-Large (logo, At-Large/RALO Bylaws etc.)? - if yes, is it in one language or in more than one? 5.2. Do you have your ALS account in social media? If yes, please provide us any details (table). 5.3. What other tools of communication do you use? 6. Meetings of ALS members 6.1. Does your ALS hold regular meetings with its members? 6.2. If yes, how often? 6.3. If yes, in what type (Face to face, teleconference, webinars, others)? (table) 7. Integration into ICANN ecosystem (Questions 11-14 from previous survey) 7.1. Scale of 1 to 5, how well is At-Large integrated in overall ICANN policy structure? (table) 7.2. Scale of 1 to 5, how well your ALS integrated in the overall ALAC/RALO/ALS policy structure? (table) 7.3. What are the most important limitations to ALS participation? (table) 7.4. Which recommendation(s) does your ALS consider the most important to increasing its own participation in ICANN? (table) 7.5. Which, if any, recommendation(s) would your ALS like to help the ALAC implement? (table)
Hi Sala/Oksana Shall I go ahead and create a survey on SurveyMonkey (not sure what you've decided in yesterday's call) ? satish On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Oksana Prykhodko <sana.pryhod@gmail.com> wrote:
Survey
1. ALS details
1.1. Date of registration.
1.2. Date of joining At-Large.
1.3. Number of members:
- individual members;
- organizational members.
1.4. Level of representation of ALS:
- international;
- national;
- regional;
- state (?);
- local. (table)
1.4. Web-site.
1.5. Contact details (?).
2. Level of expertize
2.1. Core mission (we can segregate it into different strings – technical, judicial and so on and put it into the table)
2.2. In what sphere you can provide your expertise?
2.3. Where you need the help?
2.4. Your ALS members participation in Working Groups, regional or thematic events (IGF, TechDays and so on) – could you please provide us with details? (table)
3. Level of cooperation
3.1. Did you have experience of cooperation with other ALSes, with other ICANN constituencies from your country (ccNSO, GAC and so on), ISOC chapters? (table)
3.2. Did you have experience of cooperation with parallel structures from other countries?
3.3. Did you have experience of influence on governmental decisions within your country?
3.4. Did you participate in working-out the decisions of regional structures regarding Internet Governance?
3.5. Did you participate in WCIT process?
4. Linguistic level
4.1. Native/official/working language(s)
4.2. Other languages – where you can help with translation and understanding, where you need help
4.3. Usability of any on-line tools – could you please share your positive experience regarding using of different languages?
4.4. Wiki-glossary in different languages
5. Communication tools
5.1. Does your ALS have own web-site? (table)
- if yes, does it have interactive functions (forums, chat so on)?
- if yes, does it have any information, that your ALS is the member of At-Large (logo, At-Large/RALO Bylaws etc.)?
- if yes, is it in one language or in more than one?
5.2. Do you have your ALS account in social media? If yes, please provide us any details (table).
5.3. What other tools of communication do you use?
6. Meetings of ALS members
6.1. Does your ALS hold regular meetings with its members?
6.2. If yes, how often?
6.3. If yes, in what type (Face to face, teleconference, webinars, others)? (table)
7. Integration into ICANN ecosystem (Questions 11-14 from previous survey)
7.1. Scale of 1 to 5, how well is At-Large integrated in overall ICANN policy structure? (table)
7.2. Scale of 1 to 5, how well your ALS integrated in the overall ALAC/RALO/ALS policy structure? (table)
7.3. What are the most important limitations to ALS participation? (table)
7.4. Which recommendation(s) does your ALS consider the most important to increasing its own participation in ICANN? (table)
7.5. Which, if any, recommendation(s) would your ALS like to help the ALAC implement? (table)
_______________________________________________ capacity-building-wg mailing list capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg
Hi Oksana, Thank you for your proposal. I think that at least parts 1,4,5 and 6 were in the survey performed a few years ago (I think in 2011); Dev can tell you. So, I believe we can have these information from there. The shortest and the simplest is the survey, the best it is conducted. It’s better to have less questions to encourage the ALSes to answer them. Have a nice day My address tijani.benjemaa@fmai.org is not working properly any more. Please use one of the 2 following addresses: tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn or tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Message d'origine----- De : capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Oksana Prykhodko Envoyé : lundi 20 mai 2013 19:17 À : At-Large Capacity Building WG Objet : [Capacity-Building-WG] draft survey Survey 1. ALS details 1.1. Date of registration. 1.2. Date of joining At-Large. 1.3. Number of members: - individual members; - organizational members. 1.4. Level of representation of ALS: - international; - national; - regional; - state (?); - local. (table) 1.4. Web-site. 1.5. Contact details (?). 2. Level of expertize 2.1. Core mission (we can segregate it into different strings – technical, judicial and so on and put it into the table) 2.2. In what sphere you can provide your expertise? 2.3. Where you need the help? 2.4. Your ALS members participation in Working Groups, regional or thematic events (IGF, TechDays and so on) – could you please provide us with details? (table) 3. Level of cooperation 3.1. Did you have experience of cooperation with other ALSes, with other ICANN constituencies from your country (ccNSO, GAC and so on), ISOC chapters? (table) 3.2. Did you have experience of cooperation with parallel structures from other countries? 3.3. Did you have experience of influence on governmental decisions within your country? 3.4. Did you participate in working-out the decisions of regional structures regarding Internet Governance? 3.5. Did you participate in WCIT process? 4. Linguistic level 4.1. Native/official/working language(s) 4.2. Other languages – where you can help with translation and understanding, where you need help 4.3. Usability of any on-line tools – could you please share your positive experience regarding using of different languages? 4.4. Wiki-glossary in different languages 5. Communication tools 5.1. Does your ALS have own web-site? (table) - if yes, does it have interactive functions (forums, chat so on)? - if yes, does it have any information, that your ALS is the member of At-Large (logo, At-Large/RALO Bylaws etc.)? - if yes, is it in one language or in more than one? 5.2. Do you have your ALS account in social media? If yes, please provide us any details (table). 5.3. What other tools of communication do you use? 6. Meetings of ALS members 6.1. Does your ALS hold regular meetings with its members? 6.2. If yes, how often? 6.3. If yes, in what type (Face to face, teleconference, webinars, others)? (table) 7. Integration into ICANN ecosystem (Questions 11-14 from previous survey) 7.1. Scale of 1 to 5, how well is At-Large integrated in overall ICANN policy structure? (table) 7.2. Scale of 1 to 5, how well your ALS integrated in the overall ALAC/RALO/ALS policy structure? (table) 7.3. What are the most important limitations to ALS participation? (table) 7.4. Which recommendation(s) does your ALS consider the most important to increasing its own participation in ICANN? (table) 7.5. Which, if any, recommendation(s) would your ALS like to help the ALAC implement? (table) _______________________________________________ capacity-building-wg mailing list capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg
participants (3)
-
Oksana Prykhodko -
Satish Babu -
Tijani BEN JEMAA