Hi Niels and All,

The Rights Protection Mechanism listing seem a little more directive than the other phrases -- and could be read to urge specific positions rather than just listing the ICANN proceedings that are looking at the issues.  Can we be a bit more neutral in our phrasing? I would recommend:

- Review of appropriate protections for IGOs/INGOs in gTLDs

- Review of balanced curative rights protections in IGO/INGOs in gTLDs

- Review of all rights protection mechanisms currently in gTLDs

- Review of balanced rights protection mechanisms for future new gTLD rounds

This will avoid misinterpretation... tx you!
Best regards, Kathy

Dear all,

I have integrated your comments and suggestions as well as I could and I
think we have a very nice info-graphic right now that we can present in
Helsinki.

So I would like to do a last call to see whether you all can live with this.

Of course this will remain a working document, but it would be great if
we can show this in Helsinki as work of the CCWP HR.

Looking forward to hear your comments, questions and/or suggestions.

Best,

Niels

_______________________________________________
cc-humanrights mailing list
cc-humanrights@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights