Thanks Olivier...I might got things upside down...too many things even for people like me :-P

That said, I think this "by the drafting team accepted charter" explicitly should be sent to the SO/AC.

For example, I have no idea whether SSAC officially would/will support this group, and/or how SSAC choose to interact with it.

So at least I must get some time as chair of SSAC to deal with SSAC.

That the group will now launch I think is clear (given you correcting me Olivier), we only do not know what formal support might might get.

Do not pause or stop working just because of this! :-)

   Patrik

> On 21 apr 2015, at 13:26, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Patrik,
>
> this is a CCWP. I do not know whether there is a formal method of asking
> the SO/ACs to ratify the charter of a CCWP, but I agree that it would
> make sense if they did and would support asking them.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 21/04/2015 07:34, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 apr 2015, at 01:18, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> With pleasure I can announce that the charter has been adopted.
>> Hmm...we individuals agree on the text but for a CCWG formal approval is needed. It must be passed to the SO and ACs that want to be chartering organizations for formal approval.
>>
>> Is what you say you now will send it to the SOs and ACs for approval?
>>
>>   Patrik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-humanrights mailing list
>> cc-humanrights@icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
>>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>

_______________________________________________
cc-humanrights mailing list
cc-humanrights@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights