Tanya
Exactly
The proposed wording at the moment isn’t very clear to me.
“operationalise its commitment to human rights” - whose? How? Are you talking about ICANN the corporate entity? The community? Are you trying to make something binding on contracted parties? What?
“contribute to a Human Rights Impact Assessment with the community of stakeholders” - again this is unclear. Does it refer to the ICANN corporate entity? ICANN policies? ICANN contracts? What?
“work on a process for remediation” - remediation of what?
I’ve read and re-read that draft language several times and it’s not clear to me at all
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
Dear Niels, dear all,
after reading this short email exchange with Michele, I realised that may be we have to be clearer when we send the proposed wording of the statement to the board. I suggest inclusion of the explanation "what it means".
Furthermore, after the call yesterday I am still not convinced that we can be sure that the board wants to go further than the language provided in the bylaw. I can suggest as an alternative solution that we send two proposed statements: (1) the one we
discussed on the call and which is based on the bylaw (2) the statement on operationalisation and assessment that we drafted after the call.
In this case, depending on what was the notion behind making this statement, the board can either chose one of them or draft a combination of two.
What do you think?
Cheers
Tanya