UN code of conduct China-Russia
FYI UN Code of Conduct Proposal China-Russia See Point 2 Code of conduct, items 1), 7) and 8) There is an odd mix of everything in here. Best CM
Thanks, I do not see any realistic chance that such a "Code of Conduct" will be adopted soon in the UN. 90 per cent of the proposed text is controversial. It starts already with the terminology "Information Security". There is no definition. Other instruments use cybersecurity. This is also different from cybercrime, cyberterrorism, cyberwar, cyberespionage etc. No mentioning of the Tallin Manual. Is there already a timetable for a 4th GGE? On the other hand China and Russia could take this to the BRICS Summit in Ufa (July 2015). Para. 2.12 underlines "regional cooperation". The Africans adopted last years a seperate convention on cybersecurity. The Budapest Convention has only a limited number of members. So something has to be done. CBMs could be the bridge into the 2020s, but a long way to go. And furthermore, this could be also channeled into the WSIS 10+ negotiations in NY in fall 2015. Could create addtional Problems for the renewal of the IGF Mandate. LG w -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org im Auftrag von Camino.MANJON@ec.europa.eu Gesendet: Fr 30.01.2015 23:51 An: cc-humanrights@icann.org Betreff: [cc-humanrights] UN code of conduct China-Russia FYI UN Code of Conduct Proposal China-Russia See Point 2 Code of conduct, items 1), 7) and 8) There is an odd mix of everything in here. Best CM
Interested to learn that they are back again with another version, thanks for sharing Camino. I suspect this document will be resonating around even if as WK notes it won’t be adopted per se. Indeed, look for a fun WSIS+10 intergovernmental summit in December. Bill
On Jan 31, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
Thanks,
I do not see any realistic chance that such a "Code of Conduct" will be adopted soon in the UN. 90 per cent of the proposed text is controversial. It starts already with the terminology "Information Security". There is no definition. Other instruments use cybersecurity. This is also different from cybercrime, cyberterrorism, cyberwar, cyberespionage etc. No mentioning of the Tallin Manual. Is there already a timetable for a 4th GGE?
On the other hand China and Russia could take this to the BRICS Summit in Ufa (July 2015). Para. 2.12 underlines "regional cooperation". The Africans adopted last years a seperate convention on cybersecurity. The Budapest Convention has only a limited number of members. So something has to be done. CBMs could be the bridge into the 2020s, but a long way to go.
And furthermore, this could be also channeled into the WSIS 10+ negotiations in NY in fall 2015. Could create addtional Problems for the renewal of the IGF Mandate.
LG
w
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org im Auftrag von Camino.MANJON@ec.europa.eu Gesendet: Fr 30.01.2015 23:51 An: cc-humanrights@icann.org Betreff: [cc-humanrights] UN code of conduct China-Russia
FYI
UN Code of Conduct Proposal China-Russia See Point 2 Code of conduct, items 1), 7) and 8) There is an odd mix of everything in here.
Best
CM
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
********************************************************* William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake@uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake@gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q *********************************************************
participants (3)
-
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" -
Camino.MANJON＠ec.europa.eu -
William Drake