Update: Multistakeholder HRIAs @ IGF 2018
Dear all, The CCWP-HR and NCUC co-organized a workshop to introduce new HRIA models under development in ICANN <https://icannhumanrights.net/hrias-in-icann-constructive-innovation> to the broader internet governance community during the 2018 IGF, held 12-14 November in Paris. During the workshop, many participants highlighted the challenge of defining rights-holders amongst internet users. Even so, there was broad support for companies and standard-setting bodies to introduce human rights commitments and due diligence mechanisms <https://icannhumanrights.net/due-diligence-and-why-it-matters/>. One area of divergence related to which subset of rights should be prioritized, e.g. children’s, cultural, or LGBTQI rights. Examples were given to demonstrate that impact assessment methodologies can be tailored to address specific, or various, categories of rights. As a result, participants suggested that such tools can make the subject of human rights more practical and tangible, or allow people with divergent positions to engage in a constructive way. There was widespread multistakeholder support for organizing a High-Interest or Cross-Community Session on the subject of human rights during ICANN64, which will be held in March 2019. This will be an opportunity to showcase the CCWP-HR's progress on designing and testing impact assessments geared toward ICANN policy development processes. The initial HRIA model can be found here <https://icannhumanrights.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/DRAFT-ICANN-HRIA-que...>; trial work on the Subsequent Procedures PDP kicked off this month. VIDEO FROM THE SESSION <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtzw3CAj8s8&feature=youtu.be&t=143> WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION & REPORT <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2018-ws-349-a-multistak...> Kind regards, Collin Kurre
Hi,
From the report it sounds like a great session.
The IGF session report format is a bit confining-- wondering if it would be nice to write it up in a narrative or blog format and post it to icannhumanrights.net? I can help get that going. -Mallory On 30/11/2018 21:02, Collin Kurre wrote:
Dear all,
The CCWP-HR and NCUC co-organized a workshop to introduce new HRIA models under development in ICANN <https://icannhumanrights.net/hrias-in-icann-constructive-innovation> to the broader internet governance community during the 2018 IGF, held 12-14 November in Paris.
During the workshop, many participants highlighted the challenge of defining rights-holders amongst internet users. Even so, there was broad support for companies and standard-setting bodies to introduce human rights commitments and due diligence mechanisms <https://icannhumanrights.net/due-diligence-and-why-it-matters/>. One area of divergence related to which subset of rights should be prioritized, e.g. children’s, cultural, or LGBTQI rights.
Examples were given to demonstrate that impact assessment methodologies can be tailored to address specific, or various, categories of rights. As a result, participants suggested that such tools can make the subject of human rights more practical and tangible, or allow people with divergent positions to engage in a constructive way.
There was widespread multistakeholder support for organizing a High-Interest or Cross-Community Session on the subject of human rights during ICANN64, which will be held in March 2019. This will be an opportunity to showcase the CCWP-HR's progress on designing and testing impact assessments geared toward ICANN policy development processes. The initial HRIA model can be found here <https://icannhumanrights.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/DRAFT-ICANN-HRIA-que...>; trial work on the Subsequent Procedures PDP kicked off this month.
*VIDEO FROM THE SESSION <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtzw3CAj8s8&feature=youtu.be&t=143>* *WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION & REPORT <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2018-ws-349-a-multistakeholder-approach-to-hrias-lessons-from-icann>*
Kind regards, Collin Kurre
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
-- Mallory Knodel Head of Digital :: article19.org gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780
Hi Mallory, I agree with you on the report format of the IGF event and I wasnt at the event but I can view the video recording of the session and write a blog on it/ help you with it, however you prefer it. Best, Akriti On 04/12/2018 11:25, Mallory Knodel wrote:
Hi,
From the report it sounds like a great session.
The IGF session report format is a bit confining-- wondering if it would be nice to write it up in a narrative or blog format and post it to icannhumanrights.net? I can help get that going.
-Mallory
On 30/11/2018 21:02, Collin Kurre wrote:
Dear all,
The CCWP-HR and NCUC co-organized a workshop to introduce new HRIA models under development in ICANN <https://icannhumanrights.net/hrias-in-icann-constructive-innovation> to the broader internet governance community during the 2018 IGF, held 12-14 November in Paris.
During the workshop, many participants highlighted the challenge of defining rights-holders amongst internet users. Even so, there was broad support for companies and standard-setting bodies to introduce human rights commitments and due diligence mechanisms <https://icannhumanrights.net/due-diligence-and-why-it-matters/>. One area of divergence related to which subset of rights should be prioritized, e.g. children’s, cultural, or LGBTQI rights.
Examples were given to demonstrate that impact assessment methodologies can be tailored to address specific, or various, categories of rights. As a result, participants suggested that such tools can make the subject of human rights more practical and tangible, or allow people with divergent positions to engage in a constructive way.
There was widespread multistakeholder support for organizing a High-Interest or Cross-Community Session on the subject of human rights during ICANN64, which will be held in March 2019. This will be an opportunity to showcase the CCWP-HR's progress on designing and testing impact assessments geared toward ICANN policy development processes. The initial HRIA model can be found here <https://icannhumanrights.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/DRAFT-ICANN-HRIA-que...>; trial work on the Subsequent Procedures PDP kicked off this month.
*VIDEO FROM THE SESSION <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtzw3CAj8s8&feature=youtu.be&t=143>* *WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION & REPORT <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2018-ws-349-a-multistakeholder-approach-to-hrias-lessons-from-icann>*
Kind regards, Collin Kurre
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
I also agree with Mallory about format limitation and thank Akriti for the kind offer. Best wishes, David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 -----Original Message----- From: cc-humanrights <cc-humanrights-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Akriti Bopanna Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 1:48 AM To: cc-humanrights@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cc-humanrights] Update: Multistakeholder HRIAs @ IGF 2018 Hi Mallory, I agree with you on the report format of the IGF event and I wasnt at the event but I can view the video recording of the session and write a blog on it/ help you with it, however you prefer it. Best, Akriti On 04/12/2018 11:25, Mallory Knodel wrote:
Hi,
From the report it sounds like a great session.
The IGF session report format is a bit confining-- wondering if it would be nice to write it up in a narrative or blog format and post it to icannhumanrights.net? I can help get that going.
-Mallory
On 30/11/2018 21:02, Collin Kurre wrote:
Dear all,
The CCWP-HR and NCUC co-organized a workshop to introduce new HRIA models under development in ICANN <https://icannhumanrights.net/hrias-in-icann-constructive-innovation> to the broader internet governance community during the 2018 IGF, held 12-14 November in Paris.
During the workshop, many participants highlighted the challenge of defining rights-holders amongst internet users. Even so, there was broad support for companies and standard-setting bodies to introduce human rights commitments and due diligence mechanisms <https://icannhumanrights.net/due-diligence-and-why-it-matters/>. One area of divergence related to which subset of rights should be prioritized, e.g. children’s, cultural, or LGBTQI rights.
Examples were given to demonstrate that impact assessment methodologies can be tailored to address specific, or various, categories of rights. As a result, participants suggested that such tools can make the subject of human rights more practical and tangible, or allow people with divergent positions to engage in a constructive way.
There was widespread multistakeholder support for organizing a High-Interest or Cross-Community Session on the subject of human rights during ICANN64, which will be held in March 2019. This will be an opportunity to showcase the CCWP-HR's progress on designing and testing impact assessments geared toward ICANN policy development processes. The initial HRIA model can be found here <https://icannhumanrights.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/DRAFT-ICANN- HRIA-questionnaire-model.pdf>; trial work on the Subsequent Procedures PDP kicked off this month.
*VIDEO FROM THE SESSION <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtzw3CAj8s8&feature=youtu.be&t=143>* *WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION & REPORT <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2018-ws-349-a-m ultistakeholder-approach-to-hrias-lessons-from-icann>*
Kind regards, Collin Kurre
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights
participants (4)
-
Akriti Bopanna -
Collin Kurre -
Mallory Knodel -
McAuley, David