Katrina,
Fully agree with the content of the letter.
Language suggestions:
-
First sentence “caused by the Board” seems a bit odd, mabe replace by “initiated by the Board”?
-
Endoresment -> endorsement
-
Two concurrent processes -> I would add the exact reference to the other process in the text block behind title
Best,
Peter
Van: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> namens Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Datum: maandag 24 april 2017 15:49
Aan: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Onderwerp: [ccnso-council] FW: PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2
Dear Councillors,
I know you have time until 28 April but I would appreciate your (at least initial) responses by tomorrow 12 UTC. Tomorrow we (Byron, Demi and I) have a call with Goran Marby. In case he raises issues around specific
reviews, it would be nice to know if there is a support for the arguments mentioned in the draft. If you come up with other arguments, I would appreciate if you could share them as well.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:09 PM
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: [ccnso-council] PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2
Dear Councillors,
During our call last week we discussed our participation in the RDS-WHOIS2 specific review. We decided to defer our participation due to the fact that many things, including the scope, around this review are still unclear. As agreed, here’s
a draft letter to the Board.
Please have a look and send your comments by 28 April.
Thank you and have a nice weekend!
Kind regards,
]{atrina