My comment is that, the odd typo aside, this is EXACTLY what we need to be saying.

The GDPR is a bit of a game-changer and is likely to influence data protection regimes well outside the EU as well (places like Canada and the Antipodes spring to mind (we'll leave on one side where the UK will sit) and no one knows exactly where this will take us.

We want to positively engage with ICANN staff, and the g-TLDs as there's a lot of benefits.

But we don't want to waste our time either.

Just right, in my view!


On 24/04/17 14:49, Katrina Sataki wrote:

Dear Councillors,



I know you have time until 28 April but I would appreciate your (at least
initial) responses by tomorrow 12 UTC. Tomorrow we (Byron, Demi and I) have
a call with Goran Marby. In case he raises issues around specific reviews,
it would be nice to know if there is a support for the arguments mentioned
in the draft. If you come up with other arguments, I would appreciate if you
could share them as well. where



Thank you!



Kind regards,



]{atrina





From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:09 PM
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: [ccnso-council] PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2



Dear Councillors,



During our call last week we discussed our participation in the RDS-WHOIS2
specific review. We decided to defer our participation due to the fact that
many things, including the scope, around this review are still unclear. As
agreed, here's a draft letter to the Board.

Please have a look and send your comments by 28 April.



Thank you and have a nice weekend!



Kind regards,



]{atrina






_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council