Thank you Bart for this excellent draft.

On the third paragraph there is a list of criterias and other
requirements for the working group members. Set limitations are good but
in case there are more willing participants to the WG than is
reasonable, should we have some recommendations here how to choose the
members?

I'm raising up this question because the ccTLD field is quite
heterogeneous what comes to geographic location, size, type of the
organization, etc. When working with financial contributions this
diversity plays an important role. For example, financial realities are
quite different for profit making ccTLDs and for ccTLDs in developing
countries. Or even the ability to contibute at all (state owned ccTLDs
vs. private ccTLDs).

Taking this and existing criterias in Paragraph #3 in to account, in my
opinion, WG members should represent this diversity as well as possible.
Therefore I suggest we modify the first sentence something like "Members
of the working group will be appointed by the ccNSO Council paying
attention to diverse background of the applicants"  

Juhani


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org
> [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel
> Sent: 26. elokuuta 2010 11:40
> To: ccNSO Council
> Subject: [ccnso-council] Draft charter Financial contributions wg
>
> Dear all,
> As discussed on the previous council call please find
> included the draft charter for the financial contributions wg
> for comment. To be most helpful, please send your comments to
> the list by Friday 3 September 2010.
> Kind regards,
> Bart
>