All,
I think, on balance, we should try to get this right so we don’t
need to keep re-visiting.
a)
I don’t think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some
formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think?
b)
Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable
time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council
member will ‘usually’ Chair. Having said that I do think we
should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others
think?
Cheers,
Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
au Domain Administration Ltd
Important Notice - This email may contain
information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is
intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you
have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.
From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org
[mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel
Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:21
To: Lesley Cowley
Cc: ccNSO Council
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] <no subject>
Hi Lesley,
Two quick questions:
BB:
. The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not
included in the charter.
2. Under the rules
of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO
Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'.
We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it
not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule?
BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to “ensure
that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on
outstanding issues”, the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please
note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006
prior to the adoption of the guidelines.
Kind regards,
Bart
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4647 (20091129) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com