Peter,

Thanks a lot for your comments!

>-          First sentence “caused by the Board” seems a bit odd, mabe replace by “initiated by the Board”?


Well, that’s the wording they use in the Bylaws… 

>-          Endoresment -> endorsement


Yup, thanks!

>-          Two concurrent processes -> I would add the exact reference to the other process in the text block behind title


Wanted to keep it as short and simple as possible, but technically it is possible to add footnotes

Regards,

]{atrina


 

Van: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> namens Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Datum: maandag 24 april 2017 15:49
Aan: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Onderwerp: [ccnso-council] FW: PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2

 

Dear Councillors,

 

I know you have time until 28 April but I would appreciate your (at least initial) responses by tomorrow 12 UTC. Tomorrow we (Byron, Demi and I) have a call with Goran Marby. In case he raises issues around specific reviews, it would be nice to know if there is a support for the arguments mentioned in the draft. If you come up with other arguments, I would appreciate if you could share them as well.

 

Thank you!

 

Kind regards,

 

]{atrina

 

 

From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:09 PM
To: ccnso-council@icann.org
Subject: [ccnso-council] PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2

 

Dear Councillors,

 

During our call last week we discussed our participation in the RDS-WHOIS2 specific review. We decided to defer our participation due to the fact that many things, including the scope, around this review are still unclear. As agreed, here’s a draft letter to the Board.

Please have a look and send your comments by 28 April.

 

Thank you and have a nice weekend!

 

Kind regards,

 

]{atrina