Dear Katrina and all,
This is certainly an issue in which the ccNSO input cannot be absent. 
However, to coordinate our efforts it would be best if we discuss it at the Council call.
Best regards,


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.


On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:35 AM Katrina Sataki via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Please see the email and questions below!

I believe some ccTLDs would be interested to explore the topic of DNS abuse further. What would be the best way forward?

 

Thank you,

 

]{atrina

 

 

From: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@verisign.com>
Date: Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 17:20
To: "katrina@nic.lv" <katrina@nic.lv>
Cc: "Brian F. Cimbolic" <BCimbolic@pir.org>, Jim Galvin <jgalvin@afilias.info>, Graeme Bunton <gbunton@tucows.com>
Subject: Engagement on DNS Abuse

 

Hi Katrina!

 

I hope you’re doing well and staying healthy and safe. I am reaching out to you on behalf of the GNSO Contracted Party House DNS Abuse Working Group as we look ahead to ICANN 70 and the rest of 2021.

 

The Contracted Party House (CPH) DNS Abuse Group is conducting outreach to our friends in other SO/AC/SG/Cs regarding DNS Abuse. As previously noted by the CPH, DNS Abuse comprises five categories: phishing, pharming, malware, botnets, and spam when it acts as a delivery mechanism for one of the other forms of DNS Abuse.

 

We want to open a more direct dialogue to understand pain points, hear suggestions and identify common ground where we can work together to mitigate DNS Abuse.  Is there a subset of the ccNSO focusing on DNS Abuse questions that would be able to join the CPH DNS Abuse group on a call to discuss this topic? We want to encourage frank and productive discussions  on the topic that lead to really informing our dialogues and actions.

 

As a starting point, we propose the following questions to guide our discussion.  Are there any questions ccNSO members would like discuss?:

 

What information do you use and how do you use it to assess DNS Abuse levels?

 

What are the ccNSO’s pain points regarding DNS Abuse?

 

Are you seeing practices from registrars or registries you find helpful?

 

Please let us know if a subgroup of the ccNSO would be willing to join us.  Our group meets regularly on Tuesdays at 1500 UTC.  If so, please propose a Tuesday when you are available.

 

Best regards,

Keith

 

Keith Drazek

Vice President, Public Policy & Government Relations

Verisign, Inc.

+1-571-377-9182

Kdrazek@verisign.com

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Ccnso-council mailing list
Ccnso-council@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.