PDP4 might just have submitted (or ready to submit) its Initial Report (need to check timing) – is update for GAC needed?
From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Javier Rua via Ccnso-council
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 3:18 PM
To: Alejandra Reynoso Barral <alejandra.reynoso@gmail.com>
Cc: ccNSO Council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] [INPUT REQUIRED] - Topics for joint sessions in ICANN 78
I think Jordan’s suggestions on Global Digital Compact discussions are necessary conversations and they must take place between all ICANN SOs & ACs. Mission shout be to catch and reflect all types of stakeholders -from the public/governmental to the private non-profit or for profit spectrum, to individuals within and without the technical community. Those internal inter-community ICANN conversations seem like minimum prerequisites to craft any ICANN position or viewpoint that IMHO matters. So big +1 to Global Digital Compact as major part of ccNSO outreach to ALL SOs & ACs. And ccNSO has a LOT to teach ICANN and the World: ccNSO is as all of us know perhaps the most legitimate and diverse transnational community out there (and definitely within ICANN): a) ccTLD managers from sovereign as well as non-sovereign territories from all corners of the globe, b) ccNSO does not discriminate between ccTLD managers based on their governmental, academic, or their private corporate structure; and c) ccNSO is even open to individuals, as is my case; selected via NomCom based on general geography and thus not even directly related to a ccTLD Manager.
Javier Rúa-Jovet
On Jul 21, 2023, at 7:21 AM, Alejandra Reynoso Barral via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: