Ah, OK.

Hopefully, the remote participation facility will assist in future.

Lesley

Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote on 20/03/2009 13:37:21:

> Hi Lesley,
>  
> Agree… however, I’m actually not able to say at what point they
> dropped off and re-joined, as it is only clear they are not
> present/present when they were asked to cast a vote. So – is it OK
> if I leave it as it is?
>  
> Gabi
>  
>  
> From: lesley@nominet.org.uk [mailto:lesley@nominet.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:32 PM
> To: Gabriella Schittek
> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org; Drazek, Keith; Olivier Guillard; 'Victor Ciza'
> Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] Minutes from Mexico
>  
>
> Hi Gabi,
>
> Understood. The usual format is to note the point when participants
> leave and then note again when they re-join, but I agree its messy!
>
> Have a good weekend.
>
> Lesley
>
> Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org> wrote on
> 20/03/2009 13:27:09:
>
> > Hi Lesley,
> >  
> > Thanks for your input.
> >  
> > Just a quick reply to :
> >  
> > “BTW, it might be easier to just note after 38-08 that the
> > councillors participating by telephone did not do so after this
> > point, due to connection problems (rather than repeating the dropped
> > off text from then onwards)”
> >  
> > The problem is just that they were re-connected for resolution 38-12
> > and 28-13, but were disconnected again for resolution 38-14, so I’m
> > not sure what the most elegant solution would be here.
> >  
> > Gabi
>
> >  
> > From: lesley@nominet.org.uk [mailto:lesley@nominet.org.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:20 PM
> > To: Gabriella Schittek
> > Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org; Drazek, Keith; Olivier Guillard; owner-
> > ccnso-council@icann.org; 'Victor Ciza'
> > Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Minutes from Mexico
> >  
> >
> > Hi Gabi,
> >
> > Thanks. Some comments from me:
> >
> > - Under section 3, I think we should note that the suggestion to
> > have 2 vice chairs was agreed. (Did we vote? - I think we should have)
> > - 38-08 I think we should add that this was passed unanimously 'by
> > those present'. Ditto subsequent resolutions. BTW, it might be
> > easier to just note after 38-08 that the councillors participating
> > by telephone did not do so after this point, due to connection
> > problems (rather than repeating the dropped off text from then onwards)
> > - Under 11.1, I think this should refer to the 'ccNSO work plan' not
> > the 'planning agenda'.
> > - Under 11.2, I think that the references to 'ccNSO members meetings
> > agendas' should be 'ccNSO member meeting agendas'
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lesley
> >
> > owner-ccnso-council@icann.org wrote on 18/03/2009 07:24:37:
> >
> > > Dear Councillors,
> > >
> > > The minutes from the last Council meeting are attached. Please, can
> > > I have your comment/corrections by next Wednesday, 25th March.
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > >
> > > Gabi
> > > [attachment "council minutes cd.doc" deleted by Lesley Cowley/Nominet]