My choices are as per the original poll outcome, namely:

Erick Iriarte
Lise Fuhr
Vika Mpisane
Paul Kane
Staffan Jonson

Cheers

Keith

On 4/10/2014 5:36 a.m., Byron Holland wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

I think we have to quickly hit ‘reset’ on the selection process for the
CWG.  Time constraints and a lack of a clearly defined process upfront
have led to the considerable confusion surrounding the selection
criteria for the five CWG members.

Having recently  just selected our members for the ICG – a process in
which we announced before things got going that the choice would be
largely made by a small special committee of Council, thus allowing the
nuanced discussion of who could best represent the ccTLD community to be
weighed against the many ‘diversity’ related factors e.g. geographic
region, size of registry, etc. we also wish to achieve. In the current
CWG selection process we never defined beforehand what the selection
process would be and what criteria would be applied.  Many of us have
brought different filters to making the decision, none of which are
incorrect, but they have not to my mind resulted in a clean,
transparent, objective outcome.

So, the best path forward would be to hit ‘re-set’ and call for another
poll from Council, but with the ‘criteria’ clear at the outset: the top
five candidates will form the ccNSO choice for CWG membership.

Please send your selections directly to Bart, cc’ing the Council, by no
later than Monday.

Thank you and best regards,

Byron