Greetings all.
First, thank you Joke for hitting me over the head with this additional reminder regarding this matter.
To my fellow Council members: My gut is telling me that we should have (at least) a representative (“observer”?) on this GNSO PDP. Perhaps I am mis-understanding what the GNSO means by “Transfer” in their sphere, in which case my concerns
might well be mis-placed. However, from my position as the chair of the two WG’s involved in ccTLD Retirement policy and subsequent Review Mechanisms, I think there is a need for involvement in what the GNSO is about to embark on, at least informally.
Best Regards,
/Stephen
From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org>
Date: Monday, February 15, 2021 at 07:33
To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] Triage Recommendation 01-2021
Dear Councilors,
You might have seen the email forwarded by Katrina to the Council mailing list on Monday, 8 February 2021 regarding the GNSO PDP to review the gTLD Transfer Policy. Kindly find the recommendationby the Triage Committee in the google
doc below.
If you do not agree with the recommendation, kindly let me know at your earliest convenience, latest by
16 February 2021 (23:59 UTC)
Thank you.
Best regards,
Joke Braeken
ccNSO Policy Advisor
joke.braeken@icann.org