Hi all

Thanks to you all involved with pulling this together.

The proposed suggestions look like a manageable commitment at this time, assuming we can engage some ccNSO community members who are not already involved.

I would like to raise one broader issue arising from this for us to consider:

Not very long ago we set up a new DNS Abuse group. Now we are setting up another one, and nobody is proposing we shut down the DNS one.

If another issue comes along; do we set up another group? And another?

In other words - how should we set some parameters about maximum groups, or complexity? 

Do we just keep going while we have volunteers, dealing with each issue as they arrive? 

To me that is one reasonable approach - as long as we have volunteers with genuine capacity to engage in the work.

Are there other thoughts?

Cheers
Jordan 

Jordan Carter 
Internet Governance and Policy Director 

.au Domain Administration
+61-417-243-647

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 7:39:25 PM
To: ccnso-council@icann.org <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - [ccnso-council] Your feed-back on Roadmap ccNSO&UA: Tuesday 21 February
 

Dear all,

Following the introduction of the ccNSo & UA roadmap Council meeting 192, could you be so kind to provide your feed-back, if any on the draft (included)?

To be most helpful, the ad-hoc group would appreciate to hear from you by Tuesday  21 February 17.00 UTC,

Thank you,

Kind regards,

BArt