Hi Gabi,

I don’t think you mean to ‘revoke’ the drafting team. Perhaps ‘Invoke’ or ‘request’? - and if so, I agree with the suggested action.

Kind regards,

Lesley

From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@icann.org>
Date: Monday, 8 September 2014 12:25
To: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] Urgent: Request for input 48-2014: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process

Dear Councillors,

Below is a suggestion from the Triage Committee on how to proceed with the request for input on the Enhancement of the ICANN Accountability Process.

Given the urgency of the topic and the relatively short timeframe, I would be grateful if you could let me know in case you disagree with the suggested action by Wednesday, 10 September 2014.

Thanks,

Gabi


==

 

Topic: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process

  

Originator: ICANN

  

Summary of request: ICANN has launched a 21-day Public Comment period starting 6 September 2014, to consider the "Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process" posted on 14 August, in conjunction with the stewardship transition: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en

  

Date received: 6 September 2014

  

Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 27 September 2014

  

Recommended action, if any: Revoking drafting team IANA Oversight Transition Coordination Group (who drafted a response on ICANN Accountability in May/June), ask to draft input; Post to email lists for information (done)

  

Expertise needed, if any: Legal, managerial

  

Date of submission to Council: ASAP

  

Last date of Council decision: ASAP

  

Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: High