I agree with Alejandra.
Best regards,
Christelle Vaval
Cabinet Salès
62, rue Geffrard (angle rue Chavannes)
HT 6140, Pétion-Ville, Haiti
Tél: (509) 2815-1500
Fax: (509) 2256-5107
Email: cvaval@cabinetsales.com
Pensez-y avant d’imprimer. | Think before printing.
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ - Ce message est pour l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ci-dessus. Il peut contenir de l'information privilégiée, propriétaire, confidentielle et/ou dispensée de divulgation par la loi. Si vous n'êtes pas un destinataire nommé ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur et l'effacer sans le copier ni le divulguer à quiconque, ni n'en faire aucun usage.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This communication is for the exclusive use of the above-named recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged, proprietary, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure by law. If you are not the intended recipient or have received it in error, immediately notify the sender and delete it without copying it, disclosing it to anyone or making any use of it.
AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD - Este mensaje es para el uso exclusivo del (de los) destinatario(s) indicados más arriba y puede tener información privilegiada, propietaria, confidencial y/o legalmente no divulgable. Si usted no es un destinatario de este mensaje o lo recibe por error, se le pide avisar inmediatamente al remitente y eliminar el mensaje sin copiarlo, divulgarlo o hacer cualquier otro uso del mismo.
From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alejandra Reynoso
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:13 PM
To: Katrina Sataki
Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org; Burr, Becky
Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] WHOIS Review (2016)
Dear Katrina
Yes, I think it is important that the ccTLD community is involved in the WHOIS review since it's one of the services that ccTLDs provide.
Also agree with Becky's comments.
Best regards,
Alejandra
Registro de Dominios .gt
--
Universidad del Valle de Guatemala.
18 Ave. 11-95. Z. 15. V.H. III.
Edificio J. Oficina 204.
Tels: +502.23688564 y +502.23688565
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote:
I would like to echo Katrina’s sentiment re the value of cc participation in the Whois review. Real experience – as opposed to sloganeering – would greatly improve the conversation, and cc’s are in a position to provide experience based expertise
J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz
From: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>
Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 10:48 AM
To: "'ccnso-council@icann. org'" <ccnso-council@icann.org>
Subject: [ccnso-council] WHOIS Review (2016)
Dear all,
As you recall, one of the changes envisioned under the 27 May Bylaws is the role of the ccNSO Council with respect to the specific reviews (ATRT, Security and Stability, WHOIS and consumer protection/competition).
Assuming that the 27 May Bylaws will become effective, the role of the ccNSO Council and in particular its Chair with respect to the specific reviews will change. Partly this is already covered in the proposed Guideline: ccNSO Nominations to Specific Review Teams (it will be sent to the ccNSO Council for the adoption before our next call on 13 October), if the ccNSO would decide to participate in a specific review. However, as the ccNSO Council we will still need to take some decisions, which are not covered.
Recently Chris reached out to the chairs of the SO/ACs to participate in a SO/AC chair call around the Registration Directory Service Review (a.k.a. WHOIS review). It is my understanding that this review is the next one to be launched (after the SSR review which is in its launching phase now) and will be the first one fully under the new framework. According to the 27 May Bylaws 4.6.e (ii), The Board shall cause a periodic review to assess the effectiveness of the then current gTLD registry directory service and whether its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data.
In preparation for the call (as far as I can tell it will be on upcoming Monday but it is not certain yet) I have two questions for you:
1) Do you anticipate a role for the ccNSO/ccTLD community in this specific review?
In the previous review we appointed one member (Emily Taylor). It is also my understanding that the broader community is aware that ccTLDs deal with a variety of national data protection and law enforcement regimes and it would be beneficial for the broader community to learn more about our experience.
2) Do you have any specific topics/concerns/views you would like to raise?
Please let me know your thoughts by Friday 23rd September! Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina