Bill,

See http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/.

Cheers,

Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
au Domain Administration Ltd
ceo@auda.org.au
www.auda.org.au
 
Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. William Semich [mailto:bill@nic.nu]
> Sent: Monday, 24 August 2009 13:22
> To: Chris Disspain
> Cc: ccNSO Council; ccNSO Members
> Subject: Re: [ccnso-members] FW: ccNSO review - finally started ! / tentative
> timeline
>
> Hello Chris;
>
> This email is a bit confusing to me. Are there historical links or
> other material, like action by the council or the ICANN Board, I can
> review to help me understand (or perhaps refresh my memory) what this
> review is all about?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill Semich
> .NU Domain
>
> On Aug 23, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Chris Disspain wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Update on ccNSO review below FYI.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chris Disspain
> > CEO - auDA
> > au Domain Administration Ltd
> > ceo@auda.org.au
> > www.auda.org.au
> >
> > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
> > confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for
> > the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this
> > email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the
> > sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the
> > environment before printing this email.
> >
> > From: Marco Lorenzoni [mailto:marco.lorenzoni@icann.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, 22 August 2009 00:07
> > To: Chris Disspain
> > Subject: ccNSO review - finally started ! / tentative timeline
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> > Finally, with the approval of the RfP by the Board, we have been
> > able to start the machine.
> > As you might have noticed already, the Request for Proposal for the
> > selection of the external reviewer has just been published (it’s at
> http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/ccnso/)
> > , and has been advertised on several professional associations
> > websites worldwide.
> > Tentative schedule is
> > •             25 September 2009, deadline for submitting the offers
> > •             End September/beginning October 2009: proposal
> > assessment panel will evaluate proposals received from applicants
> > •             October 2009: SIC approves the selection of the
> > external consultant
> > •             November 2009: contracting of an external consultant
> > •             December 2009: initial briefing and beginning of
> > operations (you will be requested to participate to a distant
> > briefing with the reviewers)
> > •             7 to 12 March 2010: ICANN meeting in Nairobi –
> > Contractor to conduct face-to-face interviews with community
> > Members / key informed stakeholders
> > •             Early May 2010: delivery of draft final report
> > •             Second half May 2010: finalization of report
> > •             20 to 25 June 2010: ICANN meeting in Europe –
> > presentation of report and publication for public comment. ccNSO
> > will be invited to react to the report and inform the WG about its
> > conclusions on the measures proposed
> > •             Late July 2010: end of public comment period, WG will
> > start the preparation of its report to the SIC and the Board
> > I am planning to publish on the ccNSO review page the above
> > tentative schedule and an abstract of the Terms of Reference to
> > inform the ccNSO Members of the objectives and timeline of the
> > exercise.
> > Plus, if you consider it useful, we could imagine another short
> > session in Seoul between ccNSO Members and the members of the ccNSO
> > review WG who will be present at the meeting to just give an
> > overview of the process.
> > Anything else at this point in time to ensure transparency of the
> > process?
> > Many thanks for any input on this, and best regards
> > Marco
> >
> >
> > Marco Lorenzoni
> > ---------------------
> > ICANN
> > Director, Organizational Review
> > marco.lorenzoni@icann.org
> > Phone: +32.2.234 78 69
> > Mobile: +32.475.72 47 47
> > Fax: +32 2 234 7848
> > Skype: marco_lorenzoni
> > ---------------------
> > 6, Rond Point Schuman
> > B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 4361 (20090823) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 4361 (20090823) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4361 (20090823) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com