NOTES | ccNSO Council prep meeting ICANN76
Sunday, 12 March 2023 | 15:30-17:00 UTC (10:30 - 12:00 local)
Join meeting and consult session recordings | Room: Costa Maya 1
= = =
-
Welcome
Welcome by Alejandra. Bart will moderate today, as Alejandra wants to participate.
2.
Icebreaker: your role in the ccNSO over time
Please write down your Highlights from the ccnso.
Will ask community members on Tuesday too. Will bring the banner to Washington too
3.
Succession planning
Goal:
-
agree on process for succession planning
-
Identify key roles and responsibilities
-
Agree at council meeting that current R&R of councilors will be extended until update
-
At council meeting, establish council ad hoc group to lead and manage next steps
Succession planning as strategy for identifying and developing future ccnso leaders
Key roles at all levels
Helps to prepare for contingencies by preparing volunteers to take on leadership roles
Sean speaks about leadership training he took with Everton
Process:
-
Identify key areas and positions
-
Identify capabilities for key areas and positions
-
Identify interested persons and assess against capabilities
-
Develop and implement succession and knowledge transfer plans
-
Evaluate effectiveness
Alejandra: regarding knowledge transfer. Person leaving, but mentoring successor.
Bart: do you agree with goal and process? Approved
4.
Roles and responsibilities
Key positions
-
Current ones?
-
Future ones?
Alejandra speaks to the “scary list”
Some elements could not be added here. Temporary ad hoc groups. In this doc are the longer commitments. In green: external appointments.
Bart: it makes council vulnerable. Some councillors have many roles. Unevenly distributed
Stephen: can we add something?
Bart: sure. We probably did not capture all WG
Alejandra: zero. Because for council only. In very few cases there is a role that does not have any person appointed.
Bart: this is the current list. WG is another matter. Just for council: are these roles still needed? Should we rethink now or in future whether they are still needed?
What are the roles that are absolutely necessary? See frame.
-
Chair & vice chair roles: yes, needed.
-
What about the others?
Jordan: PDP oversight committee?
Bart: support for issue manager
Tatiana: gnso, alac, gac agenda separate?
Bart: is this recorded?
Tatiana: process effectiveness in mind
Irina: what does it mean? Why is it different from the liaison role?
Bart: GAC does not have a liaison
GAC WG Originally effective, but lost its function. But chairs ccnso and chair GAC led the agenda development eventually.
Start - stop - continue: See notes in google jamboard
https://jamboard.google.com/d/1VgXKJT_7oHLAuboZHIh-yKI6wRw69gO7FOpkN04sJs0/edit?usp=sharing
Chris: maybe triage should have done this exercise first.
Bart: Bart, with respect to PDP (my example of course is PDP3), They should have a finite lifetime, but the question is when they should go away? Their end of life is dependent up
external actors, in the case of PDP3 PTI and likely both PTI and ICANN.org with respect to the review mechanism.
Current roles to continue. (except chair and vice chair elections)
Until the point new roles are defined.
Do you agree that we appoint an ad hoc committee to explore roles? Comes up with plan by ICANN77. Yes, agreement by Council
Bart: 3 volunteers already: Alejandra, Sean, Irina. Chris happy to help too.
Thank you all!
= = =
ICANN76 LINKS TO BOOKMARK NOW
• ccNSO Schedule
https://community.icann.org/x/8IMFDQ
• ccNSO Session Highlights
https://community.icann.org/x/kYYFDQ
• Tech Day