Sorry for the late response. Just got access to my email after a three-day absense.

Agreed.

- YE

보낸사람: HiroHOTTA [hotta@jprs.co.jp]
받는사람: Chris Disspain [ceo@auda.org.au]
날 짜: 2010년 2월 9일(화) 20:48:50
제 목: Re: [ccnso-council] comments on AoC review 2

 
agreed.
Hiro

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:54:08 +1100 (EST)
Chris Disspain wrote:
> All,
>
> Given the short time frame, can I send in a submission that simply
> states that the ccNSO council endorses auDA's comments?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Disspain
> CEO - auDA
> Sent from my phone
>
> On 04/02/2010, at 4:30, "Burr, Becky" wrote:
>
> > Hello All -
> >
> > I agree it would be good to comment, and I like the auDA comments.
> > But I would add that before there is anything to review, ICANN needs
> > to move forward on enhanced accountability. -)
> >
> > b
> >
> > From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-
> > council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Peter Van Roste
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:32 AM
> > To: 'Chris Disspain'; 'ccNSO Council'
> > Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] comments on AoC review 2
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree, we should use the extra time to file a ccNSO contribution.
> > Thanks for sharing the auDA submission. I think it could indeed be
> > used as a basis for a ccNSO comment.
> >
> > Especially the last part from the auDA submission raises an aspect
> > (composition of RTs and the role of the SO/ACs) that is highly
> > relevant for the ccNSO.
> >
> > Even If we only address this one issue, I believe it is worth to try
> > and get a common statement.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regs,
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
> > From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-
> > council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
> > Sent: vrijdag 22 januari 2010 2:58
> > To: ccNSO Council
> > Subject: [ccnso-council] comments on AoC review 2
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > 2 things:
> >
> >
> >
> > a) Closing date for comment now extended to 10 February.
> >
> > b) Given that we have more time, is it worth seeing if we can
> > draft a ccNSO comment on the Affirmation Review document perhaps
> > using the auDA one as a starting point? What do others think?
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris Disspain
> >
> > CEO - auDA
> >
> > au Domain Administration Ltd
> >
> > ceo@auda.org.au
> >
> > www.auda.org.au
> >
> >
> >
> > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
> > confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for
> > the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this
> > email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the
> > sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the
> > environment before printing this email.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo@auda.org.au]
> > Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2010 13:08
> > To: ccNSO Council
> > Subject: comments on AoC review
> >
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> >
> >
> > As promised at the last council meeting, attached are the auDA
> > comments on the Affirmation Review document (http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201001.htm#affrev
> > ). We will post these in the next day or so.
> >
> >
> >
> > You are welcome to cut and paste any section or sections that you
> > would like to use as well as use the entire document if you wish.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please do post comment and note that the closing date is 31 January.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris Disspain
> >
> > CEO - auDA
> >
> > au Domain Administration Ltd
> >
> > ceo@auda.org.au
> >
> > www.auda.org.au
> >
> >
> >
> > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
> > confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for
> > the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this
> > email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the
> > sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the
> > environment before printing this email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 4791 (20100120) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 4795 (20100121) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 4795 (20100121) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com